Is Grindelwald a More Dynamic Villain Than Voldemort?

Much like Sauron from The Lord of the Rings, Voldemort embodies the concept of pure evil. He’s slightly more developed as an individual through Pensieve memories, but the audience still tends to reject the notion that he may have been an innocent child. If he legitimately cannot love because he was conceived under the influence of a love potion, his fate is sealed as a symbolic force of hate. His weakness doesn’t lie in people, but in his fear of death. He gathers followers by fear and intimidation once he loses his handsome, boyish charm.  His vendetta against Muggles appeals to the psychotic, the racist, and the privileged who want to hold on to their power. He doesn’t seem to appeal to the vast majority of wizards struggling with everyday issues or value their freedom.



Fantastic Beasts, in my opinion, may give us a more dynamic villain. Gellert Grindelwald has a similar goal of solidifying wizards’ superiority over Muggles, but he’s much more manipulative in his argument. Grindelwald’s campaign stretches to the United States, whereas Voldemort seems to stay in Europe. Grindelwald takes advantage of the oppressive state of American Muggle relations when Madam Picquery insists Credence broke a sacred law:

A law that has us scuttling like rats in the gutter! A law that demands that we conceal our true nature! A law that directs those under its dominion to cower in fear lest we risk discovery! I ask you, Madam President—I ask all of you—who does this law protect? Us? Or them?”(Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them: The Original Screenplay 255)

Grindelwald’s words may strike a chord with the wizards and witches who are denied all contact with Muggles in the 1920s. The intense isolation of the wizarding community may generate resentment and fear of the unknown. American wizards could be an easy target for Grindelwald’s propaganda. Their vulnerability was surely one of his motivations to infiltrate MACUSA. Although we know the date of Grindelwald’s ultimate defeat, there’s still plenty of unknown history to explore. Grindelwald has an unpredictable quality to his treachery that Voldemort lacked. Voldemort had a foreseeable plan throughout the books: kill Harry Potter, enslave Muggles and inferior beings, and promote prejudice. We don’t know what’s motivating Grindelwald’s agenda. I’m hoping that his evolution into malicious intent will be more nuanced than “he was just born that way.”



Grindelwald possesses similar goals, but we don’t know exactly what his reign of terror entailed. His humanity is prevalent in his messy relationship with Albus Dumbledore and gives another dimension to his villainy that we’ll continue to dissect throughout Fantastic Beasts. The idea that his weakness could be a person rather than fear of death is far more relatable and compelling to me. How did Grindelwald win the duel against Dumbledore when he possessed the Elder Wand?  Did Dumbledore truly best him, or did he appeal to Grindelwald’s humanity? We also know that Grindelwald may have felt regret later in life, which gives the impression of an antagonist who believes he’s doing something for the “greater good” of the world. Voldemort didn’t seem to truly believe his cause would bring about a better world. Instead, he projected a need for demented pleasure in causing fear and pain without bounds. I’m excited to see the arc of Grindelwald’s character in the upcoming films! I foresee possible Snape-like debates if his character continues to travel into complex territory.

What do you think will happen in Fantastic Beasts with Grindelwald’s character? Let us know in the comments below!

Mikaela Martin

In the muggle world, I’m a high school English teacher and a passionate advocate of the positive force that is the Harry Potter series. I aspire to expose the next generation to the wizarding world and the wonders of literature; I truly believe the magic of Potter is a form of transfiguration–changing hearts, minds, and perspectives. But that information is old hat, of course, for us old DA lags.