The Guardian reveals opening of Deathly Hallows?
The Guardian reveals opening of Deathly Hallows? With extreme caution for lack of authenticity, we bring you this article from The Guardian's online website. It holds, what they say, is the opening to Deathly Hallows dated October 23rd, 2006.

According to their site, this small portion can be seen in video from the upcoming JK Rowling documentary we told you about a few days ago.

We've posted it in the black area below in case it is removed from The Guardian's website. Highlight in between the arrows if you wish to read.

-->'Chapter One. The Dark Lord Ascending. The two men appeared out of nowhere, a few yards apart in the narrow, moonlit lane. For a second they stood quite still, wands pointing at each other's chests: then, recognising each other, they stowed their wands beneath their cloaks and set off, side by side, in the same direction.

"News?", asked the taller of the two.

"The best," replied Snape.'
<--

Please remember that it is still unknown as to whether or not this is real. Interesting, nonetheless. Thanks to everyone who e-mailed with the tip!

Emily's edit: I emailed Andrew saying I didn't think the excerpt was real. Here's why: There is a mixture of British/English grammar - the British spelling of "recognise" and the American use of "a few yards." There are also odd punctuation errors - a colon after "chest" and then ?", when only a question mark before the quotation mark would be used. Would Jo really make these errors? We'll find out soon.
Posted by Andrew on Jul 14th | 1648 Comments
Visitor Comments
Posted by avadapotter Jul 15th 2007

i drooled. uncontrollably.


Posted by HeyHeyHey Jul 15th 2007

The ending death of the latest released Harry Potter book is... SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE


Posted by DevinUlsertis Jul 15th 2007

Imagine if the opening line was "Harry Potter had just finished killing Voldemort when Dudley came into Harry's room....."


Posted by sarahrox47 Jul 15th 2007

i dont think they should be allowed to post that cuz that is the worst kinda spoiler.


Posted by GinGin Jul 15th 2007

Nice, but I don't really think this is a real excerpt from the book!.. I don't know, it's just not Jo's style. Well, one way or another, I CAN'T wait for that book!!


Posted by Sakibou Jul 15th 2007

They posted it because they have no way of knowing for sure if it is a real spoiler. And, even if it is (which I certainly don't think is true), it's not like it gives all that much away.


Posted by Ashes1327 Jul 15th 2007

Also there is a posting on antoher websites forum of the heading of chapter seven showing a picture of harry and ginny this picture looks an awful lot like harry potter illustration if you ask me. email me arock1327@aol.com and I'll send you the link to this forum, there are a few other spoilers on this site. Oddly enough, I can no longer access the scans of the epilogue that are poster on this forum. hmm... taken down because they are real? possibly, I have no idea


Posted by lidietta Jul 15th 2007

well, well, well, I've never ever read these many spoilers before a hp book release °_° (didn't go to any links, just read the comments of you guys!) .....!!!!!!!!*-* STARSTRUCK (_ is the spelling OK?_)


Posted by sleepless Jul 15th 2007

I love it how everyone is assuming that the excerpt isn't real, even though this is from a decidedly reliable source. The chapter title is real, and I find it highly unlikely that The Guardian would risk marring their reputation in this way. However, I am willing myself to believe that this Epilogue of which we are speaking -- I saw it yesterday -- is fake. I have not read the entire thing (just in case), but the mixed up page count; its short length; and the fact that it is so poorly written cause me to believe it is fake. Also, I happen to believe that Jo is perfectly capable of writing such an opening, and I think that it is a very GOOD opening, at that. To say, "Jo would never start a book this way" is somewhat presumptuous, seeing as we can't see inside of Jo's head, and she perfectly well could've decided to start it this way. I'm not going to put it past her.


Posted by mrkurzer Jul 15th 2007

***Spoiler Discussion*** One other contraction that I've found...many of the "spoiler" websites present a pretty fundamental contraction. On the one hand, they say that Ron dies battling Bellatrix (who is subsequently killed by Neville; on the other hand, all of these epilogues seem to indicate the presence of Ron with Hermione (and their kids). I have no idea what to believe--but who cares? For now, its the same as before: theories. ***Spoiler Discussion***


Posted by MusicIsSoulVomit Jul 15th 2007

Argh, I read it and it is difficult for me to decide if I'm more excited, or disgusted with myself. I thought I had more self-control than that! *inwardly scolds self*


Posted by sticky Jul 15th 2007

MusicIsSoulVomit- i know!!!! i read it without thinking..now i hate myself, even if it is true or not i was ready to spoil a part of it. shame all of you people who read it too!! shame on us all. shame...*shakes head and ak self*


Posted by fizzlover1212 Jul 15th 2007

OMG amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't wait to read the book now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by Frozen_Inferno Jul 15th 2007

Well sleepless, I have to agree basicly with you. Although nowhere is it confirmed that the chapter title is real, its pluasible along with the excerpt. I mean yes, its not as complex as Jo likes to get all the time, but it does, at least in my opinion, contain elements of Jo's style. And since it has been written by one of Englands most reliable newspapers (who would deffinatly not want to ruin their reputation by posting something like this) its likely to be true. As to the epilogue, its deffinatly fake. Whereas this excerpt contains some of Jo's style, the excerpt contains, at least in my opnion, far less. The chapter image looks like a slightly edited image from another book and there is a mixup in the page numbers if I'm not mistaken. And its entirly possible if I'm wrong; I apologize if I am. All in all, I say wait till the 21st.


Posted by cliffy22 Jul 15th 2007

WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME WHERE THIS EPILOGUE IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by hpgirl_91 Jul 15th 2007

there are almost 8,000 of us online right now!!! DH in 6 days i can't believe it!


Posted by lidietta Jul 15th 2007

I just thought now (amazing how a simple chocolate bar can be such a braib booster.....) that, in my case, since I don't really believe all these rumors, the book isn't that "spoiled", 'cause I'll just read the book wondering about the true ending.........


Posted by rooon Jul 15th 2007

That's totally fake!


Posted by ginny101 Jul 15th 2007

I don't think this sounds like Jo. tantalizing, though....OMG! this is a fabulous time to be alive!!!! 5 days!!!


Posted by rob15 Jul 15th 2007

GINNY101: it sounds like Jo on pubic cow hair with some rat poison and some dirt


Posted by darkatheart33 Jul 15th 2007

This is fake. JK Rowling wouldn't say "for a second" she'd say "for a moment" second just doesn't fit her writing style. i don't think she's ever used second before. Still really interesting though.


Posted by Stripe Jul 15th 2007

HERE IS THE EPILOGUE http:// i13.tinypic.com/6b9k6tl .jpg http:// i17.tinypic.com/6cfi4p5 .jpg http:// i10.tinypic.com/61nud1d .jpg http:// i10.tinypic.com/6fta6hs .jpg


Posted by Sakibou Jul 15th 2007

I just thought of something else. If the last chapter is supposed to be called 'Nineteen Years Later', why does the Table of Contents only say 'Epilogue'? 'Nineteen Years Later' is kind of a crappy title anyways, especially by JK's standards.


Posted by Nino44 Jul 15th 2007

WHAT IS WRONG WITH SOME OF YOU! HOW CAN YOU STAND TO READ SPOILERS? YEARS OF WAITING UNDERMINED BECAUSE YOU CAN'T WAIT 5 DAYS! THAT'S JUST SICK!


Posted by Slorf Jul 15th 2007

Really amazing how well all of you have analyzed Jo's writing style :rolleyes:


Posted by Sakibou Jul 15th 2007

Here's a website where you can see all the so-called spoilers: ht tp://www.kaos-krew .net/harry/


Posted by plumenoire Jul 15th 2007

Oh wow, oh wow, oh wow. I don't know, I feel it's true, but wow, since we got nothing from JK for this book (no chapter title, no quote, no new character's name), it just came as a big punch in the stomach. To me, with the chapter title, I feel it's Snape with Lucius, going to a Death Eaters' meeting. Now, is it in the first war or the second? The chapter title seems to announce the first war, but I'm not sure. If it is, maybe it's DE!Snape we'll be seeing in this chapter and not Spy!Snape. Just to confuse the readers some more ;)


Posted by SiriusLoveGirl Jul 15th 2007

If it's real: ::punches the air:: WOO IT STARTS WITH SEVERUSSSSS!!! If it isn't: Nice try. I can't tell either way.


Posted by gryffygirl87 Jul 15th 2007

it's probably just a load of tosh. for one, i don't think j.k. rowling would name the first chapter of a book 'the dark lord ascending'. plus, we already know that...why do you think we are in a wizarding war in the first place? plus, its definitely NOT her writing style.


Posted by Slorf Jul 15th 2007

I really *love* all those people who think they know JKR better than her own children...


Posted by f0rtunecookie15 Jul 15th 2007

should i read it? i don't know...this is KILLINGGG me!! gahhhh ... ! i kinda don't want to read b/c of spoilers and we still don't know if the segment really is true, so i don't want to be disappointed when i get my book. soo..can somebody point me in the right direction? should i read it?


Posted by jenni107 Jul 15th 2007

i agree with plumenoire in that it's lucius malfoy. the tall guy is obviously out of the loop otherwise he would not say News? like that. if malfoys been in azkaban he might ask like that, but the dude can't be good otherwise he would not be with snape. so conclusion, evil eater lucius malfoy second war. the only question is WHEN does this take place?


Posted by Potterite Jul 15th 2007

I'm not sure if I believe it. I'd want to see that trailer (I'm good at spotting things...) What's all this about an Epilogue??


Posted by sleepless Jul 15th 2007

Gryffgirl, doesn't it seem plausible that the Dark Lord's power is increasing and that he is therefore "ascending"? It was a war before, yes, but I this will be the first time that we see the effect of his power. I wouldn't be surprised if he attempts to take over the Ministry. If that's not ascension then I don't know what is. ...And here we go again analyzing her writing style.


Posted by Sakibou Jul 15th 2007

Go ahead and read it. I doubt that it's real, but even if it is, it doesn't give anything away. Once you read it, you still won't know what's going on. As for the spoilers I posted a link to, those I'm 99.99% sure aren't real (so sure, in fact, that I'd fly to England and personally give JK Rowling a piece of my mind if they were). They'd be major if they were, but although most of the chapter titles are pretty decent, the supposed epilogue itself is a load of crap. My ten-year-old cousin could have done better.


Posted by phantom_phreak Jul 15th 2007

i'll say it again for those who didn't listen the first time. the REAL book has 784 pages and the FAKE book with scans online has only 759 pages. It simply can't be real, despite convincing art. numbers don't lie.


Posted by sleepless Jul 15th 2007

Some people on other sites were suggesting that Scholastic counts not only the book's content but the author/illustrator biography, dedication, table of contents, et cetera. I don't think they'd do that though... they've never done it that way before, have they? Hm.


Posted by cliffy22 Jul 15th 2007

The pictures look real convincing though. How would somebody get the book and post pictures of it on the internet. Who would name their son Hugo?


Posted by GinnyPotter88 Jul 15th 2007

The links don't work for me, where can you find this, it sounds very interesting, I would love to see what they posted, Thanks for any help.


Posted by Tinkerbell0578 Jul 15th 2007

OMG! should I read it? im scared. only 6 more days!!!!


Posted by HPDH2007 Jul 15th 2007

They said 5 was 890, it was 870 and they said 6 would be 672 it was 652. They count all the chapter pages, blank pages, acknowledgement, info about the author etc. 759 is more accurate. And if it was 784, I'd be more skeptical than 759


Posted by dumbledoreISdead Jul 15th 2007

the reason for the lack of pages is because there are always a certain amount of unnumbered pages for example when we first heard of the page count of HBP wasnt it like 672? but the actual numbered pages went up to 652 its because there is roughly 20 pages that have the table of contents, the about hte author /illustrator pages and so on and so forth so to me, it seems believalbe


Posted by Sakibou Jul 15th 2007

Who would name their son 'Scorpius'? And, more importants, I would hope that Harry has sense enough not to name HIS son Albus Severus. I mean, I can certainly see naming MY son after someone I've loathed for six years, but that's just me...


Posted by valster1992 Jul 15th 2007

Wow, now I really really REALLY can't wait for the book anymore...I was NOT born with patience and this just makes it worse! Can't wait! :


Posted by sleepless Jul 15th 2007

Yeah I don't see why Harry would every say anything alone the lines of, "Snape was a great man," much less name his son after him.


Posted by Scruffy Jul 15th 2007

Hmmm... who is this Snape character?


Posted by Hermione713 Jul 15th 2007

Oh, what can I say, these are fun to read. I'll be interested to see if it's really in the book. Go ahead and read it, Tinkerbell, it doesn't give away anything. :)


Posted by hinkypink730 Jul 15th 2007

I can't believe I read it...


Posted by teachingrocks Jul 15th 2007

Tease!!! It's a print tease! Is it Friday yet?


Posted by phantom_phreak Jul 15th 2007

that's just not how publishing companies count pages. the page count only includes the pages in between the first page and last page of story. if you want further proof, just look up the page counts for the other six books. they all match the actual number of story in the books. that's also why the forward and table of contents, ect. are labeled with roman numerals and not actual numbers.






Translate


MuggleNet is an unofficial Harry Potter fan site. Please email us if you have any questions or concerns. MuggleNet's original layouts were designed and created by Navy. All subsequent layouts by Dylan Spartz.

© 1999-2008 MuggleNet.com. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | COPPA Policy | Feedback | Credits
Random Addresses

1,502 muggles currently online


Poll
Does the new statement from WB President Alan Horn make you feel any better?

Updates
Today's Updates
· Updated weekly Caption Contest [August 26]
Recent Updates
· Decade in Review updated [August 25]
· Added The Magic Quill #141 [August 17]
· Twitter account for MuggleNet news! [August 14]
Mail

Quotes
Yer great puddin' of a son don' need fattenin' anymore, Dursley, don' worry.

Rubeus Hagrid
Sorcerer's Stone, Chapter 4, Page 49

See Another Quote
Big News
(8/14) - Half-Blood Prince delayed until July 17th, 2009
(6/11) - JK Rowling's Harry Potter Prequel now online!
(6/10) - Potter Prequel sells for 25k pounds
(5/20) - Scholastic Reveals Sorcerer's Stone Anniversary Edition
(3/16) - MuggleCast #137: Tripping Over Curtains: The Jim Dale Story
(3/12) - Deathly Hallows split confirmed; David Yates to direct
Release Dates
Beedle the Bard:
December 4th, 2008
The Exhibition:
Spring 2009
Half-Blood Prince:
July 17th, 2009
Wizarding World:
2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 1:
November 19, 2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 2:
May 2011

Advertisement

More from BlogHer Advertise here BlogHer Privacy Policy



MuggleNet » Fan Site Award Winner