Severus Snape: A Portrait in Subtlety
An original editorial by D.W. Hill
Copyright 2005, revised for Mugglenet 2007
Murdering a Friend: Rowling Lays the Groundwork for Considering it a Real Option
Ever since finishing my first read of HBP in July 2005, I have spent many hours thinking about and researching the character of Severus Snape. Though I have read many fine articles on Mugglenet -- some of which have addressed some of my points -- I feel that a comprehensive article examining the many overlooked clues is in order. Near the beginning of Harrys first Occlumency lesson, we read:
You have no subtlety, Potter, said Snape, his dark eyes glittering, You do not understand fine distinctions.
(OotP, pg. 530, American hardback)
This statement, in addition to being a jab at Harry, is a window into the authors mind, a glimpse at the delicate, understated way she reveals and conceals clues.
Here are my assumptions and prejudices. Extraordinary as the magical world may seem to us, internally it is quite ordinary. Witches and wizards have differing abilities, struggle to learn, mess things up, even aim poorly. They have the same range of emotions as the non-magical world. In addition, Rowling rarely pulls anything out of her hat; her mysteries and subplots have tracks that can be clearly followed when the books are re-read. I also believe that Rowlings fondness for word puzzles extends to her use of specific words and similarities in descriptions. As an example, I knew that Snape was the HBP as soon as I read the description of the handwriting on his old textbook:
...he saw something scribbled along the bottom of the back cover in the same, small, cramped handwriting as the instructions that won him his bottle of Felix Felicis,
(HBP, pg. 193)
It was almost identical to the description of Snapes writing as a teenager on his DADA OWL when Harry looked over his shoulder in the Pensieve:
his writing was minuscule and cramped.
(OotP, pg. 641)
Im not bragging. Nothing like this ever happened before, and I cannot pretend that I didnt start doubting myself when I learned that the book was fifty years old. Also, I connected R.A.B. immediately with Siriuss brother, but I read right past the reference to the broken Vanishing Cabinet in the Room of Requirement when Harry went in to hide the Princes old book. (HBP, pg. 526)
My conclusion is that the series gives overwhelming evidence that Snape is definitely not Voldemorts man; so far, he has consistently acted like Dumbledores man, even in situations where he would not have needed to. My heart says he will continue to be Dumbledores man, but this essay will stick with what I can firmly demonstrate.
Snapes murder of Dumbledore was the most devastating thing I ever experienced while reading a book -- and I have a degree in English literature, so I have read a few. To me, Severus Snape represents all of the unhappy, tormented and unpopular kids who have or will have strayed from the paths of their better natures. Aside from Harry himself and Lord Voldemort, we know more about the early life of Snape than any other character.
Throughout the series, Rowling has given us glimpses into Snapes past, which suggests troubles beyond the bullying inflicted upon him by Harrys father and godfather. During an Occlumency lesson, we see the unhappy memories which Harry extracts from Snapes mind:
-- Snape as a little boy crying in the corner as his parents argue, a kid trying to mount a bucking broomstick while being laughed at, and a teenager sitting alone in a darkened bedroom shooting down flies with his wand.
(OotP, pg. 592)
More disturbing than these are the questions raised by Siriuss recollections of Snape from school and Rowlings description of Snape, the teenager. In the cave in the mountains outside of Hogsmeade, Sirius tells Harry, Ron and Hermione:
"Snapes always been fascinated by the dark arts. He was famous for it at school. Slimy, oily greasy-haired kid he was.
Snape knew more curses when he arrived at school than half the kids in seventh year. And, he was part of a gang of Slytherins, who nearly all turned out to be Death Eaters."
Where had a boy of eleven at the oldest learned the Dark Arts? Surely, it was not from his muggle father, or His mother, whose claim to fame was that she was the president of the Hogwarts Gobstone club. Was Voldemort, like Greyback, recruiting children? What coercions were Snape and his family enduring?
In the Pensieve, as Harry sees the fifteen year old Snape leaving the Great Hall after the DADA OWL, shortly before his humiliation by James and Sirius, Rowling writes:
Snape the teenager had a stringy, pallid look about him, like a plant kept in the dark.
(OotP, pg. 640)
Later in the same passage she writes:
Round-shouldered yet angular he walked in a twitchy manner that recalled a spider, his oily hair swinging about his face.
(OotP, pg. 643)
Though the oily hair and pallid skin are consistent with Rowlings descriptions of Snape the adult, the depiction of him as walking in a twitchy manner is a departure from the many references to Snape as prowling or swooping around like an overgrown bat. Why was he walking like that? Did he have a medical condition? Had he been injured? Rowlings mother died at forty-five as a result of the most aggressive form of Multiple Sclerosis., In the summer 2002 edition of Inside MS, published by the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Scotland (findarticles.com ) she writes, Her deterioration was slow at first. There were bad spells when her walking became jerky and her general coordination suffered
Rowlings portrayals of Snapes walk as twitchy and her mothers walk as jerky are too similar to be coincidental. I am not suggesting that Snape has MS, but I doubt that Rowling could write a description like that as an off-the-cuff, meaningless page-filler -- not that that is ever her style. It does, however, strongly suggest that something else was going on.
These factors coupled with the ubiquitous descriptions of Snapes lack of attention to personal hygiene and the fact that -- Siriuss statement that Snape hung out with future Death Eaters, not withstanding -- we never see him hanging out with anyone, present Severus Snape as the picture of an "at risk" boy, if there ever was one. With Snapes murder of Dumbledore, one of the very few who ever cared for him, Rowling seems to have abandoned the opportunity to show that such people can be redeemed, that Dumbledore was right in his assertions that love is the strongest magic, and that Dumbledores followers in the Order of the Phoenix, who distrusted Snape, were, nonetheless, justified in trusting Dumbledores judgment. Some seem to feel that being wrong about Snape is almost essential for Dumbledores statements that he makes mistakes -- huge ones -- to be true. In fact, Dumbledore has made plenty of mistakes without Snapes betrayal: believing Sirius could have betrayed the Potters, trusting Mundungus Fletcher, trusting Fudge to refrain from bringing Dementors into the castle, insisting that Sirius stay cooped up at Grimmauld Place, keeping the truth about the prophecy from Harry, giving Harry a sugar-coated explanation of how James Potter had saved Snapes life and making Snape teach Harry Occlumency.
Dumbledores overriding purpose throughout the series is to find a way to destroy Voldemort, the most powerful dark wizard who ever existed. Any defense of Severus Snape must start with evidence that Snapes murder of Dumbledore advances this goal. Appalling as it might be to consider the possibility that murdering a friend could be justified, Rowling herself lays the groundwork for this perspective in the fifth and sixth books. In the lobby of the Ministry of Magic,, when Voldemort is possessing Harry in the hope that Dumbledore will kill Harry to get rid of Voldemort, Harry silently pleads that Dumbledore will do so.
"Let the pain stop," thought Harry, "let him kill us, end it Dumbledore
(OotP, pg. 816)
In Dumbledores office before leaving for the cave, Harry promised to obey him, even if he, Dumbledore, ordered Harry to leave him and save his own life.
"If I tell you to leave me and save yourself, you will do as I tell you?"
(HBP, pg. 551)
Thus, we know that Harry has already experienced a situation in which he desired to be killed by a friend and Dumbledore could foresee the possibility of an occasion where he would prefer his own death to the alternative.
Is it so far fetched to suggest that Dumbledore, who is portrayed throughout the series as a loving, courageous, polite and intelligent man, could envision many such situations? For instance, he is clearly devoted to his students and both Harry and Draco Malfoy were on the Astronomy tower when Dumbledore was killed. Consider the situation in the moments before Dumbledores murder. By the time Snape arrived, the three Death Eaters and the enraged werewolf Greyback, were growing impatient with Dracos inability to follow Voldemorts order to kill Dumbledore. At least one of them was already pointing his wand at Dumbledore. With Dumbledore sick and wandless and Harry immobilized under the Invisibility Cloak, Snape would have had to take on the four by himself. It seems unlikely that he could have pulled this off without one of them attacking him, Dumbledore or Draco. Furthermore, Harry, though invisible, would not have been safe from spells that went astray as they so often do, including on that very evening. Since Draco clearly noticed that there were two brooms on the tower, it seems safe to assume that Snape would have also. Furthermore, since he knows about the Invisibility Cloak, having used it himself in Azkaban, he may have guessed that Harry had to be there. If Dumbledore had lived, Voldemort would have killed Draco and his mother. Also, if Snape had not stepped in and killed Dumbledore, he, Snape, would have died because of the Unbreakable Vow he made with Narcissa Malfoy.
Snapes Part in Dumbledores Plan: The Only One with All the Skills
Dumbledore has, I believe, an even greater reason for placing the lives of Severus Snape and Harry above his own. They are both crucial to his plan to defeat Lord Voldemort. By the end of HBP, Harry knows that, before he can vanquish the Dark Lord once and for all, he must find and destroy as many as four Horcruxes. It is unlikely that any of them will be less dangerous or less difficult to find or destroy than the three with which Harry is already familiar. In each case, the destruction of the Horcrux as well as the survival of those who came in contact with it depended on powerful magic and at least one other person. Harry almost died trying to save Ginny Weasley from Tom Riddles diary, Voldemorts first Horcrux, in Chamber. He only managed it with the help of Dumbledores Phoenix and Gryffindors magical sword. After Harry retrieves the real memory from Slughorn, Dumbledore credits his own "prodigious skill and Professor Snapes timely action when I returned to Hogwarts desperately injured: (HBP, pg. 503) for saving him from the curse that was on Slytherins ring and limiting its effects to his right hand. On the night he died, Dumbledore takes Harry with him to find another Horcrux. He needs Harrys help both to get to the locket and to get back to Hogwarts. Though Harry did destroy Riddles diary, he did so with the poisonous fang of Slytherins monster, which he had killed with Gryffindors sword. Also, the diary was designed to fall into innocent hands and did not have the same protections as the ring and the locket. Harry was not with Dumbledore when he destroyed the ring and Dumbledore never told him how he did it. The locket they retrieved on the night Dumbledore died was a fake, left in Voldemorts hiding place by the person who took Slytherins real locket. Thus, Harry does not know how to destroy a real Horcrux and can only speculate about how it might be done.
It is inconceivable that Dumbledore, who has thought so long and carefully about the destruction of Voldemort, would not have made provisions for the likelihood that it would not occur in his lifetime. It is unfathomable that he would expect Harry, Ron and Hermione to tackle such dark magic without assistance.
No character other than Snape has been shown to have all of the skills that will be necessary to destroy Voldemort. Harry has seen evidence of Snapes extraordinary talents as a healer, potion maker and fighter. Extremely ill from drinking the poison potion on the night he died, Dumbledore insists that it is Snape whom he needs not Madam Pomfrey. Also, he credits Snape with saving Katie Bells life as well as his own, and Harry witnessed first hand his healing of Draco Malfoy from the curse Harry so unwisely used against him. Though Harry did not know that Snape was the Half-Blood Prince until after Dumbledores death, he came to respect Snape and rely on his judgment as a potion maker by using his old textbook.
Harrys unsuccessful attempts to duel with Snape, after Dumbledores death, are only the latest examples of Snapes skills with a wand. During the first Quidditch match in Stone, Snape protected Harry from Professor Quirrell who, while he was secretly being possessed by Voldemort, was trying to kill Harry. In Chamber, Harry saw evidence of his powers in the first and only meeting of the dueling club. In Azkaban, though he -- like the rest of the Wizarding World -- was mistaken about Sirius Black, Snape shows his bravery in his attempt to save Harry from Black, which meant he would have to enter the tunnel to the Shrieking Shack where he was almost killed as a sixteen-year-old, knowing that it was the full moon and Lupin had not taken his potion.
In Phoenix, Harry learns about Snapes extraordinary skills in Legilimency, the ability to extract feelings and memories from another persons mind, (OotP, pg. 530) and Occlumency which seals the mind against magical intrusion and influence,(OotP, pg. 530). And, while were talking about Snapes cerebral skills, notice the qualifiers he uses in that first Occlumency lesson. He says that, The Dark Lord, for instance, almost always knows when somebody is lying to him, (OotP, pg. 530) and that Eye contact is often essential to Legilimency, (OotP, pg. 531). Hmm, almost always knows and often essential? Sounds to me like a guy whos been lying to the Dark Lord and who is an even better Legilimens than we think.
If Dumbledore did see Snape as crucial to his plan, he would not have wanted Snape to jeopardize the ultimate goal of destroying Voldemort on the slim chance that Snape would be able to save him without endangering Draco, Harry or himself. Dumbledore would have also known that, if Snape murdered him -- Unbreakable Vow or not -- that Snape would be in the best position to learn more about Voldemorts Horcruxes. Yes, I believe Dumbledore and Snape have been discussing Horcruxes longer than we have. When Dumbledore says he trusts Severus Snape completely, I believe he means it. And, -- we might as well get this out of the way now -- Dumbledore wouldnt participate in an Unbreakable Vow, the wizard equivalent of holding a gun to somebodys head.
The Double Agent Unraveled, Part 1: The Big Bluff
So far, however, all I have shown is that Snapes murder of Dumbledore is one of those circumstances which would seem to benefit both of his erstwhile masters. When seeking to determine the true allegiance of any double agent, one must discount most of what that person says and does on either side as necessary to maintain that persons cover. One must look at the subtleties in what is said and left unsaid, and weigh the value of what is done to determine which side benefits most. The only examples of Snape talking with fellow Death Eaters outside the presence of others are his conversation in his living room with Narcissa Malfoy and her sister Bellatrix Lestrange and his confrontation of Draco Malfoy, which Harry overheard the night of Slughorns Christmas party.
Before looking at these examples, lets examine Snapes situation at the end of OotP. By the time Harry is caught using the fire in Professor Umbridges office on the afternoon of the day Sirius was killed, Dumbledore has already fled from Hogwarts, and Snape has thrown Harry out of his office after catching him in the Pensieve viewing his worst memory. Draco Malfoy and several other Slytherins, who are part of Umbridges Inquisitorial Squad and are guarding Hermione, Ron, Neville, Ginny and Luna, witness the cryptic exchange between Snape and Harry in the office of the then Head Mistress. Harry is trying to get a message to Snape that Voldemort has Sirius at the Department of Mysteries.
"Hes got Padfoot," he shouted, "Hes got Padfoot at the place where its hidden."
(OotP, pg. 745)
Dolores Umbridge repeats the name Padfoot and although Snape acts disdainfully uninterested and changes the subject by addressing Crabbe about his hold on Neville, it is quite possible that Draco remembers this exchange. Though he is unlikely to have repeated it to his father who is arrested later that evening, it is reasonable to assume that his Aunt Bellatrix, who falls from grace when she is unable to retrieve the prophecy for Voldemort, would question Draco to see if he knows anything that would explain how the Order of the Phoenix found out about the plan.
On Harrys first evening at Number Twelve Grimmauld Place, Sirius laments:
Voldemort will know all about me being an animagus by now. Wormtail will have told him, so my big disguise is useless.
(OotP, pg. 82)
Also, at the end of the Christmas holiday, in the kitchen at Grimmauld Place after telling Harry that he will be teaching him Occlumency, Snape argues with Sirius.
Speaking of dogs, said Snape softly, Did you know that Lucius Malfoy recognized you last time you risked a little jaunt outside?
(OotP, pg. 520)
Even if Siriuss nickname didnt filter down to Bellatrix and Draco, how much of a leap would it be to suspect that Padfoot might be a nickname for a dog? Though Snape could no doubt shrug this off by saying that of course Harry thinks hes in the Order, thats the point of being a spy, it could explain why Bella still mistrusts him, why she has taught Draco Occlumency and why Draco has turned on his favorite teacher.
Nonetheless, as far as we know, Snape has not done anything big for Voldemort, since telling him about the first half of the prophecy. It was predictable that Voldemort would test Snape, require something big of him just as it was predictable that Voldemort would punish Lucius for destroying the diary and botching the job at the Ministry and predictable that with Lucius safely in Azkaban that that punishment would fall on Draco. Even Narcissas visit is no great leap. Predictability allows for preparation and Dumbledore and Snape had plenty of time to consider all of these options and plan accordingly. Snape and Dumbledore are cunning enough to realize that Voldemort will be going after either Dumbledore or Harry, and that without the prophecy it is more likely that Dumbledore would be first since he provides Harry with some level of protection
In the summer before Harrys sixth year, Snape has an unexpected visit from Narcissa Malfoy, who is clearly distressed and her sister Bellatrix Lestrange, who is just as clearly not happy about being there at all. There is no reason to assume that anything Snape says to either of them is true. This includes his knowledge of the plan and his confession that he had a role in killing Emmalene Vance and Sirius Black. Even if Snape is loyal to Voldemort, the obvious tension between Snape and Bellatrix could be part of a power struggle as they both vie for Voldemorts favor. In such a case, truthfulness would not be realistic to assume. Also, remember that we have no information about Emmalene Vances murder allowing for the possibility that her death was staged to help Snape win favors with Voldemort.
Snapes actions at Spinners End are consistent with a good bluff. Wormtails interruptions, the sharing of wine and the discussion with Bellatrix about Snapes supposed treachery to the Dark Lord give him time to weigh his options and to pick up any clues -- whether through Legilimency or cunning interpretation -- about the nature of the visit. The story he gives Bella, whether true or not, is no doubt the same one he gave Voldemort. Therefore, telling it would require no great mental effort, leaving him plenty of energy for Legilimency.
Lets examine their visit in light of what we know about Occlumency and Legilimency. According to Snapes comments to Harry in his first Occlumency lesson:
Eye contact is often essential to Legilimency.
(OotP, pg. 531)
Here is his description of how to use Occlumency to block it:
Control your anger, discipline your mind.
Keep in mind how Snape describes Harrys failure to do this:
"You are allowing me access to memories you fear, handing me weapons."
(OotP, pg. 536)
At the beginning of the visit to Spinners End, we read:
Dark as her sister was fair with heavily lidded eyes and a strong jaw, she did not take her gaze from Snape as she moved to stand behind Narcissa.
(HBP, pg. 23)
After he hands them wine, we read:
Narcissa murmured a word of thanks whilst Bellatrix said nothing but continued to glower at Snape. This did not seem to discompose him. On the contrary, he looked rather amused.
(HBP, pg. 24)
After Bellatrix tells him that she doesnt trust him, we read:
Narcissa let out a noise that might have been a dry sob and covered her face with her hands. Snape set his glass down upon the table and sat back again, his hands upon the arms of his chair smiling into Bellatrixs glowering face.
(HBP, pg. 25)
In typical Snape fashion, he goads Bella several times by belittling her imprisonment and rubbing it in that she bungled the job at the Ministry. The emotional responses she has to this taunting on top of her concern about what Narcissa is about to do would, according to Snapes comments, make her more vulnerable to having her mind penetrated. Notice what Bellatrix divulges in this passage.
"My information has been conveyed directly to the Dark Lord," said Snape, "If he chooses not to share it with you"
"He shares everything with me, said Bellatrix, firing up at once, "He calls me his most loyal, his most faithful"
"Does he," said Snape, his voice delicately inflected to suggest his disbelief, "Does he still, after the fiasco at the Ministry?"
"That was not my fault," said Bellatrix flushing, "The Dark Lord has in the past entrusted me with his most precious ..."
(HBP, pg. 29)
Knowing what we now know about Voldemorts Horcruxes, what precious thing do you think he entrusted to her? Also, throughout the visit, Snape is tight-lipped basing his comments on what is said to him. Narcissa tells him at the door that it is urgent. Snape gets a strong hint that Voldemort is involved early in the conversation, just after Wormtails second interruption:
She took a great shuddering breath and started again, Severus, I know I ought not to be here. I have been told to say nothing to anyone, but
(HBP, pg. 25)
After Snape defends his actions to Bellatrix, we read:
Taking advantage of her silence, Snape turned to her sister, Now, you came to ask me for help, Narcissa? Narcissa looked up at him, her face eloquent with despair.
Yes, Severus, I
I think you are the only one who can help me. I have nowhere else to turn. Lucius is in jail and," she closed her eyes and two large tears seeped from beneath her eyelids, "The Dark Lord has forbidden me to speak of it, Narcissa continued, her eyes still closed, "He wishes none to know of the plan. It is very secret, but
"If he has forbidden it, you ought not to speak," said Snape at once, The Dark Lords word is law."
Narcissa gasped as though he had doused her with cold water. Bellatrix looked satisfied for the first time since she had entered the house. "There!" she said triumphantly to her sister, "Even Snape says so. You were told not to talk. So, hold your silence."
But, Snape had gotten to his feet and strode to the small window, peered through the curtains at the deserted street, then closed them again with a jerk. He turned around to face Narcissa frowning.
"It so happens that I know of the plan," he said in a low voice, "I am one of the few the Dark Lord has told. Nevertheless, had I not been in on the secret, Narcissa, you would have been guilty of great treachery to the Dark Lord."
"I thought you must know about it," said Narcissa breathing more freely, "He trusts you so, Severus."
"You know about the plan?" said Bellatrix, her fleeting expression of satisfaction replaced by a look of outrage, "You know?"
"Certainly," said Snape, "But, what help do you require, Narcissa? If you are imagining that I can persuade the Dark Lord to change his mind, Im afraid there is no hope, none at all."
"Severus," she whispered, tears sliding down her pale cheeks, "My only son."
"Draco should be proud," said Bellatrix indifferently, "The Dark Lord is granting him a great honor, and I will say this for Draco, he isnt shrinking away from his duty. He seems glad of a chance to prove himself, excited at the prospect."
(HBP, Pg. 32-33)
Notice that Snape brings up his knowledge of the plan only after Narcissa refers to it as a plan. Narcissa is the one who mentions her son first and Bella confirms that Voldemort has ordered Draco to do something. Notice too Snapes harsh criticism of Narcissa, adding to her emotional distress. Also, Snapes trip to the window gives him even more time to collect his thoughts. Though Narcissas eyes are closed during Snapes conversation with her sister, she looks directly at him well before making the Unbreakable Vow, giving him ample opportunity to read the identity of Voldemorts target in her mind.
The Double Agent Unraveled, Part 2: The Little Lie
In calling into question someones truthfulness, its nice to be able to point to at least one inconsistency. Rowling provides us that luxury. In Snapes living room Bella presents a succinct list of reasons that she and other Death Eaters doubt Snapes loyalty to the Dark Lord. Hidden within Snapes frank confession that he thought that the Dark Lord was finished and that he, Snape, wanted to stay out of jail, is a curious little lie.
"I should remind you that when Potter first arrived at Hogwarts, there were still many stories circulating about him, rumors that he himself was a great, dark wizard, which was how he had survived the Dark Lords attack. Indeed, many of the Dark Lords old followers thought Potter might be a standard around which we could all rally once more. I was curious, I admit it, and not at all inclined to murder him the moment he set foot in the castle."
(HBP, pg. 30-31)
If he had been curious about Harry, I would have expected Snape to show mild interest in Harry if not out-and-out favoritism. The books, however, tell a different story. In Chapter Eight of Stone, it says:
At the Start-of-Term Banquet, Harry had gotten the idea that Professor Snape disliked him. By the end of the first Potions lesson, he knew hed been wrong. Snape didnt dislike Harry; he hated him.
(SS/PS, pg. 136)
Why tell such a lie? Surely, Bella would not condemn Snape for hating Harry from the start. Snapes willingness to hide this animosity suggests that it might have been nurtured with Dumbledores blessing, in part to protect Snapes cover.
In addition, by exploiting his hatred of Harrys father, Snape gives Harry a view of himself, his family and his situation which no one else can provide. In response to Snapes attitude toward him, Harry has been forced to develop defensive skills far earlier than he might have otherwise. Snape, though often cruel and always unkind, is nonetheless right about Harry most of the time. In Chamber, he was right that Harry knew more about the attack on Filchs cat than he was telling the staff, and he was right that it was Harry who threw the firework into Goyles cauldron. In Azkaban, he was right that Harry was leaving the castle illegally, right that Harry was lying to him about the Marauders Map, and right that Harry had helped Black escape. He was also right that Dumbledore had given Harry a sugar-coated version of the circumstances in which Harrys father had saved Snapes life. In Goblet, he was right that Harry was wandering around the castle after hours in his Invisibility Cloak. In Phoenix, he was right that Harry was not taking his Occlumency lessons seriously. In Prince, he was right that Harry was lying to him about where he had learned the Sectum Sempra spell which he had recklessly used on Draco without knowing what it did, and he was right that Harry was lying to him about his potions textbook.
The other seemingly candid conversation between Death Eaters is in Chapter Fifteen of Prince. When Snape confronts Draco Malfoy on the night of Professor Slughorns Christmas party, he tells Draco that he, Draco, is suspected in the attack on Katie Bell. He does not tell Draco, however, -- and Draco asks him directly -- that it was Harry who brought his suspicions about Draco to the staff and that Harry had overheard Dracos conversation in Borgin and Burkes before the term started. (HBP, pg. 322) We can feel reasonably sure that Snape knew this not only because of Dumbledores trust, but because with Dumbledore absent, McGonagall clearly did not hesitate to take the critically injured Katie Bell or the cursed necklace to Snape, and would probably have shared Harrys suspicions with him. Also, there are several curiously uncharacteristic Snape moments in the fifth and sixth books which suggest that Snape may be exaggerating his hatred of Harry. In Phoenix, during Harrys first Occlumency lesson, Snape says:
"I have been told that you have already shown aptitude at resisting the Imperius Curse."
(OotP, pg. 534)
When have we ever heard Snape say anything vaguely complementary to Harry? On the evening when Professor Trelawney is thrown out by Professor Umbridge, Harry and Snape are having a verbal fight in Occlumency. They hear a woman scream and Snape asks Harry, if he saw anything unusual on his way down to his office (OotP, pg. 594). When has Snape ever asked Harry a question without sneering? Even more out of place is Snapes reaction to Harrys use of the Sectumsempra spell on Draco Malfoy. For years Snape has threatened to have Harry expelled for things like wandering around after hours in Stone, the flying car incident in Chamber, and leaving school without permission in Azkaban. Then, only months after saying to Bellatrix:
"I have done my utmost to have him thrown out of Hogwarts, where I believe he scarcely belongs."
(HBP, pg. 31)
Yet when Snape catches Harry red-handed, having just used a potentially lethal spell, the matter of expulsion doesnt even come up. Since we are told that,"
Snape had told the staff precisely what had happened," (HBP, pg. 529), we cant accuse him of going light on Harry to avoid the possibility that spreading around information about that particular dark spell might just come back to bite him.
Furthermore, there is a host of information suggesting that Snapes actions have been far more beneficial to Dumbledore than to Voldemort. In Chapter Thirty of Goblet, before Voldemorts return, when Dumbledore is explaining to Harry how the Pensieve works, Harry sees Snapes face in the Pensieve and hears him telling Dumbledore that his Dark Mark has been growing stronger all year. In Chapter Thirty-Six, in the hospital wing on the very night of Voldemorts return, knowing that Harry is watching closely, Snape shows his Dark Mark to Cornelius Fudge, the Minister of Magic, who was refusing to believe Harrys contention that Voldemort was back. In Chapter Thirty-Seven of Phoenix, Dumbledore tells Harry that Snape told him that Harry was having dreams about the hallway to the Department of Mysteries and that Harry had seen a vision of Voldemort speaking to one of his Death Eaters. Since Snape acquired this knowledge during private Occlumency lessons with Harry, why would he have had to share it with Dumbledore at all? How does Voldemort benefit from Snape telling Dumbledore about Voldemorts extreme anger with Lucius Malfoy over the destruction of Riddles diary? How does Voldemort benefit when Snape downplays Harrys abilities to Narcissa and Bellatrix?
From Dumbledores comments about his trust in Snape and that it was Snape who treated the injuries he received from the dark magic that almost killed him when he found Slytherins ring, it would seem that Snape would have to know that Dumbledore was trying to destroy Voldemorts precious Horcruxes. He could have shared this information with Voldemort nearly a year before Dumbledores death. If he had, it is inconceivable that Voldemort would have waited as long as he did for Dumbledores murder, or that he would have entrusted the job to a sixteen year old boy.
Also, Snape clearly alerts the Order of the Phoenix he suspects that Harry has gone to the Department of Mysteries. Some argue that Snape does this too late to be of any use. From the perspective of Voldemorts original plan, however, it makes no sense for Snape to alert them at all. Voldemort hopes to obtain the prophecy and hopes it will give him the secret to getting rid of Harry. Why invite members of the Order to the battle, when the priority is to get rid of Harry? Also, Bellas comments in Chapter Two about that night suggest that she and the other Death Eaters did not expect to see them. Snape says:
"And, forgive me, you speak of dangers. You were facing six teenagers, were you not?"
[Bellatrix replies] "They were joined, as you very well know, by half of the Order before long."
(HBP, pg. 29)
By the way, her comment as you very well know, could be construed as an accusation.
Consider too the argument which Hagrid overheard between Snape and Dumbledore in Chapter Eighteen of Prince during the week prior to the incident in which Ron was poisoned by the mead that Draco had intended for Dumbledore. Hagrid overheard Snape telling Dumbledore that he, Dumbledore, was taking too much for granted and that maybe he, Snape, didnt want to do it anymore. It is highly unlikely that they were arguing, as Hagrid attempts to suggest, about Dumbledores orders that all Heads of House investigate their own houses in light of the attack on Katie Bell. Perhaps, Snape was getting tired of keeping an eye on Draco, which he was doing both for Dumbledore and Dracos mother. Certainly, Dracos uncharacteristic rejection of Snapes help and vicious aspersions on his motives, on the night of Slughorns Christmas party in Chapter Fifteen, could not have lent any joy to the task. It is more likely that Dumbledore, knowing that Voldemort had ordered Draco to murder him and that Draco would not be able to do so, was coming to grips with the likelihood that Snape would have to do it. He may have been reminding Snape of a promise -- not unlike the promise that he received from Harry -- that Snape made to obey him and attempting to prepare him for the high cost they both would have to pay in order to rid the world of this evil wizard. Also, Snape, clearly unpopular with both the Death Eaters and members of the Order of the Phoenix and now having lost the respect of his favorite student, may have truly been coming unglued. If Dumbledores plan, as I suggest, did include Snape helping Harry, he would be even less inclined to do so after Harrys trip into the Pensieve in Chapter Twenty-Eight of Phoenix. Snape had hidden the memory of the vicious attack on him by Harrys father and godfather and Snapes subsequent lashing out at Lily when they all were in school. It was clearly something he did not wish to share with Harry. In any case, if Snape was truly loyal to Voldemort and knowing that Dumbledores murder was immanent, why risk raising suspicions by arguing with Dumbledore at all?
Snape, the Anathema: Conspicuously Absent and Out of Control?
Snape has been curiously and conspicuously absent from several major events throughout the series which would have given him a chance to stand up for Voldemort. Where was Snape at the end of Stone? He had been tailing Quirrell all year, knew he was trying to kill Harry and prevented him from doing so at least once. He knew that Harry, Ron and Hermione were up to something on the afternoon of the showdown with Quirrell/Voldemort, but he is nowhere to be seen that evening. In Chamber, He knows Harry is lying about what he knows about the attacks, but doesnt seek him out when he learns that Ginny Weasley has been taken into the Chamber of Secrets. In Azkaban, he is under Harrys Invisibility Cloak in the Shrieking Shack to hear enough of the conversation to arouse anyones curiosity, but manages to remain knocked out long enough to miss witnessing the truth about Wormtail. In each case, Snapes presence would have caused him more trouble with Voldemort, if he was truly on Dumbledores side. As it is, he can say he didnt know that Voldemort was possessing Quirrell, that Voldemort was the Heir of Slytherin or that Wormtail was working for Voldemort.
In Stone, Snape could have read the truth in Quirrells mind. Dumbledore knew that it had been Riddle the first time the Chamber of Secrets was opened. Did Dumbledore order Snape to avoid getting involved? Perhaps, in Azkaban, Snape may have awakened and realizing that Pettigrew was the traitor after all, he also realized that he couldnt risk being known to have acquired that information. Wandless and knowing that Lupin hadnt taken his potion, he could have guessed that getting out of the Shrieking Shack was going to be risky under any circumstances. Remaining knocked out may have been the best survival strategy.
Snapes reputation as a sadistic, angry man who likes hardly anyone has been well documented. Theres no doubt that he has reasons to hate Harrys father and Sirius and that he has been dreadful to Harry, Neville, Ron and Hermione in particular. He seems out of control in the Shrieking Shack when he confronts Black and has a full-blown hyssy fit in front of the Minister of Magic at the end of Azkaban. He never misses a chance to needle Harry. Anyone who doesnt think Snape could be exaggerating his anger should remember what he said to Harry during their first Occlumency lesson:
"Fools who wear their hearts proudly on their sleeves, who cannot control their emotions, who wallow in sad memories and allow themselves to be provoked this easily - weak people, in other words - they stand no chance against his power."
(OotP, pg. 536)
With the exception of the heart on the sleeve bit, isnt that pretty much a description of Snape? And yet, dont we know that Snape is in Lupins words a superb Occlumens. Isnt anyone a little disturbed by the fact that Snapes behavior has consistently defied his own descriptions of what is needed to do Occlumency? Those who dismiss anger as an emotion that would compromise a persons ability to do Occlumency should notice that it was Harrys anger which inspired those remarks from Snape in the first place.
Clear your mind, Potter, said Snapes cold voice, Let go of all emotion.
But Harrys anger at Snape continued to pound through his veins like venom. Let go of his anger? He could as easily detach his legs.
(OotP, pg. 535)
What about the things he said to Harry when Tonks left him at Hogwarts gates in Prince? Wasnt it a bit lame, bringing up the flying car, accusing Harry of wanting to be seen and then forbidding him to wear his cloak? As Sirius would say, I ask you!
Harrys Faulty Memory, Missing Connections, Hints and Hopes
In Chapter Twenty-Nine after Dumbledores murder, members of the Order of the Phoenix assemble in the hospital wing. They lament Dumbledores steadfast trust in Snape and wonder what Snape could have possibly told Dumbledore that would have convinced him so thoroughly that Snape had changed. Harry tells them that he knows. He tells them that it was Snape who gave Voldemort the information which sent him after the Potters. He tells them, that Dumbledore said that Snape, hadnt realized what he was doing, that he was really sorry that hed done it, sorry that they were dead. (HBP, pg. 616) In this, Harry is both misinterpreting Dumbledore and failing to consider two memories which would have shed light on the subject.
Snape did carry the first half of the prophecy to Voldemort and Dumbledore does say, You have no idea of the remorse Professor Snape felt when he realized how Lord Voldemort had interpreted the prophecy, (HBP, pg. 549) and he says that he believes it to be the greatest regret of Snapes life and the reason he returned. Notice that Dumbledore says Snapes remorse was about how Voldemort had interpreted the prophecy not that Harrys parents had been killed. Snapes remorse upon returning to Dumbledore, feigned or not, could not have been over the deaths of Harrys parents. In Harrys first trip into the Pensieve, he hears Dumbledore testify that Snape returned to their side before Voldemorts downfall -- in other words before Harrys parents were killed. Harry has also forgotten what he heard Cornelius Fudge say in the Three Broomsticks before Christmas in his third year. Fudge says:
"Not many people are aware that the Potters knew You-Know-Who was after them. Dumbledore, who was of course working tirelessly against You-Know-Who, had a number of useful spies. One of them tipped him off and he alerted James and Lily at once."
(PoA, pg. 204)
Could it have been Snape? Perhaps, Voldemorts intent to kill a child, especially Lilys child, finally offended Snapes sensibilities. Nevertheless, Dumbledore does not say that his trust in Snape is based on Snapes remorse. When Harry asks him, after his first trip into the Pensieve, what made him think Snape had really stopped supporting Voldemort, Dumbledore says:
"That, Harry, is a matter between Professor Snape and myself."
(GoF, pg. 604)
When Harry revisits the subject in his lesson with Dumbledore, after overhearing Snape and Malfoy outside Slughorns Christmas party, we read:
"I have been tolerant enough to answer that question already," said Dumbledore, but he did not sound very tolerant anymore, "My answer has not changed."
Rowling emphasizes her sympathy for Snape by having the portrait of former Head Master Phineas Nigellus Black say, "I should think not."
Also, Rowling loves to use curious little omissions in her writing. We dont hear all of Snapes conversation with Quirrell in the Forbidden Forest in Stone. Similarly, Hagrid doesnt hear exactly what Snape and Dumbledore are talking about. Other scenes are alluded to though we dont get to witness them. In Prince, we learn that Bella has been teaching Draco Occlumency, but dont get to hear them talking privately. Two other scenes at the end of Prince are similarly missing from our arsenal. What did Dumbledore do on the night he died when he sent Harry back to Gryffindor Tower for his Invisibility Cloak? In the shed at the Burro after visiting Slughorn, Dumbledore says:
"Firstly, I wish you to keep your Invisibility Cloak with you at all times from this moment onward, even within Hogwarts itself just in case. You understand me?"
(HBP, pg. 79)
We have no evidence that Harry has not followed his wishes. Dumbledore doesnt ask him if he has it, but tells him to go get it. Harry uses the opportunity to alert Ron and Hermione about Draco and to give them the Felix Felicis potion. Does Dumbledore use the time to tip off Snape? Dumbledores and Snapes offices are on the same side of the Marauders map. There might be a secret connection between them and if not, theres always floo powder.
The other unknown is Flitwicks version of what happened to him in Snapes office when he went to warn him about the Death Eaters. Neither Madam Pomfrey nor Flitwick weigh in on this. Though Madam Pomfrey is in the room tending to Bill and could have theoretically clarified things, Hermione, who tells the story, is speaking in a manner in which Madam Pomfrey may not have been able to hear. There are three references to the way in which she was speaking about what she and Luna experienced outside of Snapes office:
...said Hermione in a high-pitched whisper,
She covered her face in shame and continued to talk into her fingers so that her voice was muffled.
(HBP pg. 619)
Were assuming that Hermione is right that Snape stupefied Flitwick. We dont have any real proof that Flitwick didnt just collapse as Snape tells Hermione and Luna. Furthermore, if Snape did stupefy Flitwick, he could have done so either to eliminate an opponent or to protect a friend.
A rather revealing incident takes place in Chapter Twenty-Eight of Prince when Harry is chasing Snape through the Hogwarts grounds after Dumbledores murder. When Harrys Stunning spell misses Snape, Snape turns around and there are several heated exchanges between the two. Amidst the predictable rhetoric (Harrys fury at Snape for murdering Dumbledore and Snapes typical aspersions on Harrys abilities and his fathers character), there is a peculiar statement, As Snape is blocking Harrys curses, he says:
Blocked again and again and again, until you learn to keep your mouth shut and your mind closed.
(HBP, pg. 603)
This would seem insignificant if not for the fact that casting nonverbal spells was a big part of Harrys education in his sixth year and learning how to close his mind to the Dark Lord was the whole point of his Occlumency lessons. Could Snape be trying to give Harry a clue? Consider this. Snape stops the Death Eaters from torturing Harry and tells them to remember their orders. They were to leave Harry:
"He belongs to the Dark Lord."
(HBP, pg. 603)
Notice that Voldemort does not even want his Death Eaters to stun Harry and bring him to him, though they had an excellent opportunity to do so. Perhaps, Snape suspects that with Dumbledore gone, Voldemort, who still doesnt know what that prophecy said, may again try to manipulate Harrys thoughts. Surely, Snape knows that Harry is no match for the Death Eaters until he masters nonverbal spells and no match for Voldemort until he masters Occlumency.
Other hints exist in the authors descriptions of key events. Just before Snape kills Dumbledore in Chapter Twenty-Seven, it is written:
...there was revulsion and hatred etched in the hard lines of his face.
(HBP, pg. 595)
Compare this with the description of Harry earlier on the same evening. In Chapter Twenty-Six, in the Cave, when Harry was force-feeding poison to Dumbledore in obedience to Dumbledores orders, it says:
Hating himself, repulsed by what he was doing, Harry forced the goblet back toward Dumbledores mouth.
(HBP, pg. 571)
I wonder what expression Harry had on his face. Could it have been all that different from Snapes?
Finally, there are little hints that what Harry thinks of him matters to Snape. In Phoenix, during his Occlumency lesson, Harry is questioning Snape about how they know about Voldemorts intentions to - well, to do something to Harry that Occlumency could help him with.
"And, Vo... he realized I was there?"
"It seems so," said Snape coolly.
"How do you know?" said Harry urgently, "Is this just Professor Dumbledore guessing, or ..."
"I told you," said Snape rigid in his chair, his eyes slits, "to call me Sir."
"Yes, Sir," said Harry impatiently, "but how do you know?"
"It is enough that we know," said Snape repressively, "The important point is that the Dark Lord is now aware that you are gaining access to his thoughts and feelings. He has also deduced that the process is likely to work in reverse. That is to say that he has realized that he might be able to access your thoughts and feelings in return."
(OotP, pg. 533)
Snapes comment, I told you to call me, Sir. is strategically placed. If Snape has really been trying to help Harry all along and if he learned about Voldemorts plans to use his connection with Harry to lure him into a trap, I would imagine that he would want a little more respect than Harry has shown him so far. Much has been made of the life debt that Wormtail has to Harry and Snapes debt to Harrys father. Harry, however, was saved by Snape in the first Quidditch match in Stone and Harry has never so much as thanked him. Also, in light of what we now know about Snapes skills as a healer, I am curious about Harrys recovery after struggling with Quirrell/Voldemort at the end of Stone. Dumbledore tells Harry that he was unconscious for three days and that the struggle almost killed him. All along, weve assumed that it was Madam Pomfrey who tended to him, perhaps we've been wrong.
If Snape wasnt getting the respect from Harry he thinks he deserves prior to his murder of Dumbledore, he certainly wont be getting it any time soon. If Snape didnt really want to kill Dumbledore, imagine how he must feel knowing that he did it in front of Harry. Notice the description of Snape in Chapter Twenty-Eight in his last exchange with Harry.
"Dont," screamed Snape -- his face was suddenly demented, inhuman, as though he was in as much pain as the Yelping, howling dog stuck in the burning building behind them, -- "Call me coward!"
(HBP, pg. 604)
Rowlings willingness to depict Snapes pain shows a measure of sympathy for him which would seem out of place in light of his murder of Dumbledore and unnecessary if that act had been the final overriding proof of his loyalty to Voldemort.
The Nose Hypothesis: A Big Beason for Hope or One Last, Desperate Gasp
Having gathered this evidence, I felt justified in my belief that at the end of his life Dumbledore was pleading with Snape to take his life not to save it. Then, a knotty little problem occurred to me. I believe that I have shown that Snapes true loyalty is not to Voldemort, and that he has so far acted in a way which supports the theory that he is loyal to Dumbledore; but that is a far cry from proving that he will ultimately be loyal to Dumbledore even after Dumbledores death. What if Snape is simply loyal to himself? The articles, Machiavellis Half-Blood Prince by B.J. Texan, HP and the Half-Blood Antagonist by Melissa Walker and Dumbledores Iron-Clad Reason by Scott Andrew Walker, present chilling and compelling evidence for this perspective. Perhaps, Snape has used Voldemort to get rid of Dumbledore and plans to use Harry to get rid of Voldemort before turning on Harry. Snape certainly does not seem to be bound to either side by any warm and fuzzy relationships. Also, he has plenty of reason to be angry with Dumbledore and Harry, as well as his fellow Death Eaters. It seems more likely, however, if he is, indeed, just out for himself, that his loyalty has changed. He may have been loyal to Dumbledore until Harrys arrival at Hogwarts. His old rivalry with Sirius and Harrys father, Dumbledores fondness for Harry and his refusal to tell him the truth about his situation, as well as Dumbledores sugar-coated explanation of the incident in which Snape nearly died may have, over time, soured Snape on Dumbledore.
There is, however, one final piece of information which does suggest that Snape is on the right side, and it is the very first thing I noticed years ago -- the nose hypothesis. There are many characters in the Harry Potter books and, although Rowling always gives us some physical description of her characters, she rarely mentions their noses, but the times she does are rather significant and suggest that the guys with noses which stick out are good and those with smaller, flatter noses are -- well -- not so good. For the purposes of this essay, I am looking only at the noses of wizards.
The first mention of the old schnoz is in reference to Dumbledore when he comes to Privet Drive to drop off Harry:
... his nose was very long and crooked as though it had been broken at least twice.
(SS/PS, pg. 8)
a long nose...
(SS/PS, pg. 93)
Heres Harrys view of Victor Krum -- another good guy, right? -- coming up to the castle:
Harry caught a glimpse of a prominent, curved nose and thick, black eyebrows.
(GoF, pg. 247)
A comparison lets us know that James Potters nose falls under the good guy category. When Harry enters Snapes worst memory, he sees his fifteen-year-old father and it says:
It was as though he was looking at himself but with deliberate mistakes. Jamess eyes were hazel, his nose was slightly longer than Harrys and there was no scar on his forehead...
By this measure, Snapes hooked nose (SS/PS, pg. 126) would put him in the good guy category.
(OotP, pg. 641)
Now, lets look at the other side of the coin. This is the description of the face of Voldemort sticking out of the back of Quirrells head:
It was chalk white with glaring red eyes and slits for nostrils like a snake.
(SS/PS, pg. 292)
When he steps out of the cauldron in the graveyard, we read:
Whiter than a skull with wide, livid, scarlet eyes and a nose that was flat as a snakes with slits for nostrils.
(GoF, pg. 643)
Notice how Rowling describes Voldemorts most faithful servant, Barty Crouch, Jr. as his Polyjuice Potion wears off near the end of Goblet, after Dumbledore finds the real Mad-Eye Moody locked in his own trunk:
Then, before Harrys very eyes, the face of the man on the floor began to change. The scars were disappearing, the skin was becoming smooth. The mangled nose became whole and started to shrink.
(GoF, pg. 682)
Did you catch the comparison between Crouch and Mad-Eye Moody? Even though a large chunk was missing from Moodys nose, it was still bigger than Crouchs. Though he wasnt a Death Eater as far as we know, we also have Ludo Bagman -- a crook at the very least -- whose nose was squashed (GoF, pg. 86).
The reference which is most troubling to this theory is the description of Wormtail when he is forced out of his rat disguise:
... something of the rat lingered around his pointed nose and his very small, watery eyes.
(PoA, pg. 366)
Hmm, that could be a nose that sticks out -- blowing my theory, or else indicating that Wormtail might redeem himself, though I cant imagine what could make up for killing all those people and bringing Voldemort back -- or it could just be a small, pointed nose. After all, rats noses arent that big.
Nonetheless, I am hoping that Snape and Harry will come to a meeting of the minds. I hope that Rowling will cast Snape as the broken, flawed, penitent hero who does what is necessary to stop the damage to which he has contributed in spite of how difficult and distasteful it may be to him. I am bracing myself, however, for the possibility that Snape may remain in the wind as the symbol of the continued presence of evil in the world, that he might die saving Harry or that his actions will remain ambiguous. We will just have to wait for Deathly Hallows to find out.
Posted by: Amy