Love, Love, Love

An original editorial by Lil'layah



I have little doubt that the illustrious Editors on MuggleNet (not to mention everybody else) are rather sick of hearing furious, unsubstantiated rantings about what exactly is behind the door in the Ministry of Magic.

Good. This isn’t one of them.

Instead, I’d like to propose an alternative to the position that it’s love which Harry possesses more than any other. Not a simple argument that it isn’t love; an argument on why it can’t be and a substantiated hypothesis for what it could be. As with just about everything JKR does, it’s complicated. In fact, how exactly I managed to rule out love as a possibility originates in an entirely different theory: one postulating what would seal Book 7. My first goal is to rule out love; the second is to take you through the process I used to determine what else it could possibly be.

My conclusion is based primarily on analysis of dialogue. Most of what I rely on for evidence comes from Dumbledore. I know there are some readers who now feel he is not a reliable source of information, but I would disagree with that. JKR has said that the two characters she uses to give Harry information are Hermione and Dumbledore. Realize that he has never actually lied, only withheld information and certainly knows a great deal more about what’s going on than the majority of the characters in the series. For this reason, I put faith in Dumbledore’s trustworthiness as a narrator.

I’d also like to keep this (and myself) in perspective. As Firenze said:

“Trivial hurts, tiny human accidents...These are of no more significance than the scurrying of ants to the wide universe, and are unaffected by planetary movements.”
As for what the evidence has directed me to believe will happen, we must journey back the end of my school year, the spring before Book 5 was released. Let’s start at the beginning, shall we?

Philosopher's/Sorcerer's Stone

It all comes back to the very first book, the determiner of the inevitable conclusion. Harry, our Hero, gets that really nasty scar in a really nasty way and I won’t bother recapping. Voldemort doesn’t die when the Killing Curse rebounds; there isn’t enough human left in him to die at that moment. The point I noted then, which will have repercussions later, was the second half of the conversation Harry had with Dumbledore in the hospital wing:

“But why couldn’t Quirrell touch me?”
“He didn’t realize that love as powerful as your mother’s for you leaves its own mark...It is in your very skin.”
Harry is protected from Voldemort because the power of his mother’s love lives in him. It is love that protects him. Love, love, love. This has been explained by a reliable character within the text. Thus far, we have no reason to doubt what Dumbledore says. I don’t buy theories that it was anything else as they are all based on “what ifs” and speculation. Besides, it makes perfect sense. Love does not extinguish with death. Remember it: love, love, love.

We also learn our contenders have brother wands: holly representing life for Harry, yew representing death for Voldemort. Their cores are phoenix feathers from Fawkes. This is an indicator that we need to pay special attention to this bird’s cameos later in Books 2 and 4. Two sides of the same coin. Same at heart. Love and hate. Not that Fawkes doesn’t clearly have a favorite of the two. Love, love, love, love, love.

Chamber of Secrets

We’re chatting with Dumbledore again. This time, it’s about who Harry really is and why the Sorting Hat wanted to put him in Slytherin:

“Voldemort put a bit of himself in me?”
“It certainly seems so.”
Harry has a bit of Voldemort in him? That must mean the protection of love can’t protect him from everything evil, as a bit of Voldemort slipped past the defensive line into Harry. Love isn’t infallible. At least so many things make sense now: Parselmouth, complete disregard for rules, absolute hatred of Malfoy, Voldemort radar, etc.

Goblet of Fire

Jump ahead to the graveyard. Harry’s arm is sliced open (ouch), his blood taken (ew), and added to the potion that gives Voldemort new life (we know this can’t be good). Voldemort chooses to disregard the sensible advice of the "Evil Overlord’s Guide" and proceeds to reveal all on pg. 653 of the American Edition:

“His mother left upon him the traces of her sacrifice...This is old magic, I should have remembered it, I was foolish to overlook it...but no matter. I can touch him now.”
And touch Harry he does. Now, as big an idiot as Voldie is, he’s still one of the foremost wizards of his age with his only true rival being Dumbledore. I trust he knows his spells and formulas, worthless as his promises and emotional insights are. Continuing to give out pearls of wisdom about how brilliant his master plan was (*snicker*), Voldie himself confirms that the transfer was complete on pg. 657:
“...for the lingering protection his mother once gave him would then reside in my veins too...”
Clearly, Voldemort now has what protected Harry from the Killing Curse within himself, now sustaining his life, if only in body and blood. Voldemort now has...love?

What the *expletive*, you must be asking yourself. Why, why, why? It can’t be love, Voldemort is the bad guy, the Evil Overlord, the Tormentor of Innocent Muggles, He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named! He is not capable of love; he is to rise up more terrible than before!

It’s not a problem at all. I mean, Harry still manages to fulfill his Hero role with Voldemort coursing though his mind and body. Voldemort can certainly still function as Villain with such a trifling thing as love in him. Yet, exactly how this affects Voldemort -- and I mean in ways other than the ability to touch Harry -- has yet to reveal itself in this series. Harry is having a few doubts as to where he ends and Voldie begins in Book 5. Who’s to say Voldie isn’t having the same problems with Harry (or will in the future)? Aside from that, remember what happened when Voldie tried to kill Harry the first time. Hagrid reckons that he didn’t have enough human in him to die. Harry has just given Voldie his humanity back, and with that, the ability to bleed.

Back to the events occurring in the book. Harry relates the duel, stating that Voldemort could now touch his face to Dumbledore, and the latter's response is:

“For a fleeting instant, Harry thought he saw a gleam of something like triumph in Dumbledore’s eyes.”
And then I saw it, so perfectly clear. The night Voldemort tried to kill Harry, he left some of his own powers inside of Harry; a terrible, evil curse as we’ve gathered from Books 1 and 2. Now, the power of love has been instilled in Voldemort, binding them both together. Their wands are brothers; they are brothers. And what is this new power coursing through Voldemort’s veins? Love. It’s something to think about: the bad guy, who’s never had one redeeming quality about him, has Harry’s (or at least Lily’s) pure love sustaining his life. They are now two sides of the same coin. Two wands with the same core.

Harry and Voldemort are now completely, irrevocably, even.

This is when I screamed in agony, threw my books across the room, fell to my knees and yelled: “Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!”

Poor Harry. Poor, poor Harry. If they are the same coin, if Voldemort is no longer all-powerful inhuman, and has settled for his old body back instead of immortality (pg. 656, GoF), reduced to functioning human (and this little love thing throws a wrench in that system) they’re both in for it. If Voldemort goes, Harry’s going. If Voldemort survives, Harry survives. I found it unlikely, if not impossible, for Voldie to make it through Book 7. It’s not a matter of only one individual surviving the other. I feel other editorials have explained away this interpretation.

I thus titled this my Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde Theory. I figured that they both would share the same fate, being as they clearly couldn’t occupy the same time and space together. It was just inevitable. It could only end by them destroying each other.

Looking for more support for my theory, (as one thread of evidence is never enough, people!) I re-read Prisoner of Azkaban, as I hadn’t collected support from that book yet. I ran into a sidelong comment I’d always paused over. It was made by Dumbledore about Trelawney:

“Who’d have thought it? That brings her total real predictions up to two. I should offer her a pay raise...”
Realizing then that this had to be a clue to something, I pondered if it could mean that Trelawney had made my prediction about Voldie and Harry. I mean, the books are about the two of them and JKR has a tendency not to give out useless information. Perhaps Voldie got wind of her little prediction and went to try and prevent it. Lot of good it did him.

But about that time JKR gave out her Order of the Phoenix clue through, who else, but Dumbledore:

“It is time...for me to tell you what I should have told you five years ago, Harry. Please sit down. I am going to tell you everything.”
So I went back five years ago, to Book 1, and this time, actually paid attention to what Dumbledore said to Harry, on pg. 298, the key to everything. Dumbledore speaks a warning about truth. Then Harry asks:
“Voldemort said that he only killed my mother because she tried to stop him from killing me. But why would he want to kill me in the first place?”
“Alas, the first thing you ask me, I cannot tell you. Not today. Not now.”
But we now know he should have...

Anyway, I ran around my house, throwing punches in the air. My twin is my witness. I had figured it out. Trelawney’s first prophecy was about Harry and Voldemort. Come on, this series is all about Harry Potter. If someone makes a sidelong comment about a missing prophecy, its content was about Harry. Voldemort had come that night to stop it from coming true. But what it was...I couldn’t be absolutely positive at that time. It must have had something to do with Harry destroying him, and that meant that my theory of them destroying each other was viable, as well as Harry surviving Voldie.

As shown in other essays (and I noticed immediately upon reading Book 5 as I was on the watch for it) the word “either” can mean “both” or "or." As JKR says that she was very careful about the way she worded the Prophecy, and hinting that the answer is the less obvious of the two, I’m thinking it’s "both." Sorry for thoroughly bursting your bubble.

Translating the Beyond

For Book 5, there are two topics that interested me. We’ll just follow this love issue for now. I couldn’t help myself, thinking I was so clever to figure out this prophecy thing before the next book came out. As it had prematurely led me to the answer I desired, I felt sure that my Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde Theory was the correct answer. Then, with Book 5, I became entranced by the possibility that Harry has something “in such quantities and which Voldemort has not at all” in the Department of Mysteries, behind a locked door.

First things first. Book 5 quotes to consider. The mother of all quotes is, of course, the Prophecy:

"EITHER MUST DIE AT THE HAND OF THE OTHER FOR NEITHER CAN LIVE WHILE THE OTHER SURVIVES."
Either is your death warrant. RIP Harry James Potter, we’ll miss you.
"Let the pain stop," thought Harry. "Let him kill us...End it, Dumbledore...Death is nothing compared to this...And I’ll see Sirius again..." And as Harry’s heart filled with emotion, the creature’s coils loosened, the pain was gone.
Note the “filled with emotion” bit, but we’re not told exactly what emotion. Later with Dumbledore and what brought all this questioning up in the first place:
"There is a room in the Department of Mysteries...that is kept locked at all times. It contains a force that is at once more wonderful and more terrible than death, than human intelligence, than forces of nature. It is also, perhaps, the most mysterious of the many subjects for study that reside there. It is the power held within that room that you possess in such quantities and which Voldemort has not at all. That power took you to save Sirius tonight. That power also saved you from possession by Voldemort, because he could not bear to reside in a body so full of the force he detests. In the end it mattered not that you could not close your mind. It was your heart that saved you."
And everybody on MuggleNet came up with the one that occurred to me immediately: love. But as soon as I thought it, I realized it simply didn’t coincide with the logical explanation of events occurring in Book 4. Another quote from Book 5:
“...you possess in such quantities and which Voldemort has not at all...”
So long as Dumbledore is a trustworthy narrator, it was Lily’s love that prevented Voldemort from killing Harry and lies under Harry’s skin. It’s love which was transferred to Voldie when he gained Harry’s protection, proven by his ability to touch Harry. It only follows that they both have love. Thus Voldemort and Harry have love within them. They share this trait. It makes both human and susceptible to death; it’s not unique to Harry.

Did I get it all wrong? Maybe it wasn’t love which protected Harry in Book 1. Maybe it was something else. Maybe Dumbledore and Voldie, the greatest wizards of their age, don’t know their stuff. Maybe Rowling didn't realize the contradiction she’d make by using love (*falls over giggling* Sometimes I crack myself up).

When has Rowling ever done anything simply? When has she ever done what’s obvious? She knows we’re catching on to how she works; we’re not too clever for our own good, but for her good. She said it herself.

So it’s unlikely it’s as simple as the contradictory love. Where do we find the answers? What clues has she left us?

It is at this time, I’d like everyone to go and read Severus Riddle, Harry Snape and Tom Potter and I’d like you to read up until the author assumes the dividing line is love, then STOP! I've just explained why I don’t believe this would work and so it doesn’t apply to where I’m going.

I’ll wait. Go, on, I’m not rehashing what already is so plainly and well written...Good.

It all ties into the question I must answer to discover the Secret Emotion. What separates Harry from Tom and Snape? An intriguing question. So many similarities, many which support my first theory that Harry will die along with Tom, circumstantial evidence as it may be. If we go along with the theory that everyone has something at their core, an inescapable truth, then Harry should be in Slytherin. The Sorting Hat wanted to put Harry in Slytherin. As Dumbledore stated once, Harry possesses:

"Parseltongue – resourcefulness – determination – a certain disregard for rules..."
Then why not put him in Slytherin? Again, from Dumbledore:
"It is our choices, Harry, that show us for what we really are, far more than our abilities."
That people have something at their core which is an inescapable determiner of their person is a relic of the self-proclaimed “enlightened” British who used it as an excuse to partition and compartmentalize other nationalities. In India, British officers of the East India Company tried to understand the people of India by merely looking into their past. As if that would absolutely tell them who Indians were at heart, at some incorruptible, unchanging, core. They were honest in their endeavors, but were shocked when Indians didn’t conform and revolted in 1857.

Whether or not people believe in this core doesn’t matter; the only system that matters to this study is what Rowling believes. She clearly doesn’t think there is an absolute core to us, determining who we are and what our actions will be. She sets up the conclusion that we are who we choose to be, not what we are by inescapable nature. Remember, Snape’s a Slytherin, but he’s working for the Order of the Phoenix. Whether he maintains his role as good guy or goes back to the other side is uncertain. So Snape can choose as well.

Harry’s Hero status exists because he chooses to be the Hero and that shows who he is. But this is not an emotion, so “choice” isn’t the answer for what Secret Emotion Harry possesses.

So as long as my original Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde Theory holds water, our current status regarding the door situation is thus: the thing behind the door isn’t love, is an emotion, something about the heart, something inexplicable like “choice,” something that causes both comfort and agony, and Voldie can’t understand it.

Once again, I found the most bloody obvious answer and was insanely furious with myself as to why I didn’t think of it before. What does every Hero in the great fantasy pieces have that everyone else around them lacks in sufficiency?

Not an easy thing to answer, by any means. I took out Lord of the Rings, a work which Rowling most certainly is familiar with. It has proven to have parallels to Harry Potter in various instances, and is probably a relatively safe text to use as a supplement to this series. The same could be said about Star Wars, although I’d certainly accept the argument that it has a good deal fewer similarities to HP as opposed to, say, LotR.

Once again, I pondered, and took about a day to come to a conclusion, so brilliantly simple, I wanted to tear my hair out.

"Estel."

A New Hope

“There was never much hope. Only a fool’s hope.”

“Your overconfidence is you weakness.”
“Your faith in your friends is yours.”

Luke has hope.

“It is pointless to resist, my son.”
His father doesn’t.

“Yet hope remains, while the company is true.”

“She said, even now there is hope!”

“There is still hope.”

“Estelio amen.”

So obvious. These heroes are holding on to a hope and a prayer. They fight when all is lost. Why? Because they have an inordinate amount of hope. A ridiculously stupid quantity of hope. So much hope that they hang on when all others can only let go.

And the kicker is, once I went back, the Harry Potter books are stuffed full of hints suggesting this.

Naught in Book 1, as this is all about setting up that love bit to be knocked down later.

On pg. 312 of Book 2, in the Chamber of Secrets Fawkes comes to the rescue:

Music was coming from somewhere. It was eerie, spine tingling, unearthly; it lifted the hair on Harry’s scalp and made his heart feel as though it was swelling to twice its normal size.
And a continuation of this in Book 4, pg. 664, during the duel:
And then an unearthy and beautiful sound filled the air...It was coming from every thread of the light-spun web vibrating around Harry and Voldemort. It was a sound Harry recognized, though he had heard it only once before in his life: phoenix song.
It was the sound of hope to Harry...the most beautiful and welcome thing he’d heard in his life...He felt as though the song were inside him instead of just around him...It was the sound he connected with Dumbledore, and it was almost as though a friend were speaking in his ear...
"Don’t break the connection."
What must be closely examined here, in relation to my theory, is how it fits with the evidence in Book 5. The phoenix’s song is “the sound of hope” and it feels to him “as though the song were inside him instead of just around him.” Hope not only covers the song of the phoenix, the core of Tom and Harry’s wands, but the song is inside of Harry. Hope lies within Harry. How does Voldie respond to this? Fear. He doesn’t know what’s going on. Harry sends that bead of connection right back at Voldemort. This causes Voldie’s wand to “emit echoing screams of pain” (pg. 665). Hope, being sent back at Voldie, hurts and brings forth the shadowy images of the dead, reversing his evil spells.

And doesn’t Dumbledore say that what’s behind the door is something Voldie can’t stand? What’s more irritating, frustrating, annoying than all these pesky Mudblood lovers who still think they can defeat you while you know you’re the most powerful being on earth? You’d never be able to understand it, you can’t see why they feel it, you hate it because it means they’re going to try to kill you and your Deathmunchers. Hope is useless. Hope is incomprehensible. Hope is not an emotion you feel.

But wait, there’s more!

In Book 3 we meet the dementors (*involuntary shiver*). As they take the form of what we fear most, it would make perfect sense that the form they assume for Harry would represent Harry’s weakness before the Dark Lord. That somehow, a dementor would be removing from Harry what he needs to be able to protect himself from Voldie or even defeat him. That dementors would somehow strip Harry from being the Hero into someone helpless against Voldie as nearly everyone else is in the books, would cause Harry paralyzing fear. The same fear all others have for the Dark Lord.

This all begs the asking: why are the dementors the things Harry fears most, rather than Voldie?

Rowling, in interviews, explains the dementors as a kind of a manifestation of depression. As true as this explanation must be, it never really satisfied me, and I felt like there was something more to it. What is depression really? It is despair from life, paralyzing an individual, taking away the will to live. The opposite of despair is hope. The horrors in Harry’s life have been numerable and drastic, but they don’t seem to overtly affect his character in day-to-day life. I mean, he hasn’t become depressed, a danger to himself and others, or run off with a bunch of Slytherins, now has he? What’s happened to him is enough to make anyone do that. Yet there’s something which keeps Harry from loosing it, and it’s probably more than just simple choice. I say, Harry has hope.

As Professor Lupin describes dementors:

"They infest the darkest, filthiest places, they glory in decay and despair, they drain peace, hope, and happiness out of the air around them." (pg. 187, PoA)
And, as we all know, continues to explain that we lose our happy memories, etc.

It makes even more sense that Harry would have such a violent reaction to the dementors and fears them more than Voldie. If the dementors take away hope (and I’d say Lupin probably knows what he’s talking about), and hope is the key to Harry’s protection, Harry would be stripped of any kind of defense or offence against Voldie. Without hope, he’s defenseless against his own despair, as many depressed teenagers can attest to. Despair, in nearly every fantasy tale, is the one thing that can destroy a Hero.

Anakin is a wonderful example of someone who has given up any hope that resistance is possible. At the black gate, Aragorn (whose Elvin name, Estel, means ‘hope’) & Co. are presented with Frodo’s mithril shirt to induce them to despair, but in the Heroic tradition, he refuses to give in and fights anyway. Go hope!

Of course, all would be for naught unless hope fits into what’s happening and being said in Book 5. If it can’t, then the theory is bogus. Perhaps the sentences are like the word “either” in the Prophecy; trying to trick us into looking one way, while in fact, truth remains in another direction. Remember this?

“Let the pain stop," thought Harry. "Let him kill us...End it, Dumbledore...Death is nothing compared to this...And I’ll see Sirius again..." And as Harry’s heart filled with emotion, the creature’s coils loosened, the pain was gone.
OK, so let’s try this with both possible Secret Emotions. Harry wants Dumbledore to kill him, (death wishes are their own kind of despair) and Voldie is gaining on him. Death invariably leads to thinking of Sirius and the phrase “And I’ll see Sirius again” isn’t exactly something which would evoke love. Sure, Harry loves Sirius, but just the fact someone is dead doesn’t mean you stop loving them. Love always lingers. The real pain accompanying the death of a loved one isn’t with love; it’s that you miss them. I know it all too well; it’s agony wanting them with you again more than anything else. They’re not there in the physical to be with you when you need them. Harry’s train of thought here isn’t leading him to reminisce about the wonderful love he feels for his godfather. His train of thought is that Sirius is dead, evoking the acute pain of missing him, and the desire to have him back.

But the next best thing to having them back with you (which any rational person knows is impossible) is to die as well, with the hope of being together again. Tom Riddle doesn’t have loved ones waiting for him on the other side. He murdered, never had a constant caretaker or role model or knew his mother. There is no welcoming breath of hope which comes with being reunited with deceased loved ones. This is where love and hope cross together; love lingers to protect, hope charges on. Harry doesn’t fear death for this reason. Tom fears it on the level that he can’t understand or appreciate it. He never loved anyone save himself. He can’t understand that there is anything worse than death. Loss of hope, despair, depression; all are the same and worse than death. Why do you think people commit suicide?

At that moment when Harry thinks of a reunion with Sirius, I’d say he is hopeful. He’s hoping Sirius hasn’t left him forever, that with death, he can be with him again. His mum and dad. After all, doesn’t Harry get all excited, hopefully running around, trying to find out if Sirius could come back from the dead? It’s the same feeling Harry gets when Sirius says Harry can come live with him when his name is cleared.

As soon as Harry feels this emotion, “the creature’s coils loosened, the pain was gone.” No matter what it is, whatever emotion that wells up in Harry at that exact moment, is what foils Voldie. This is later confirmed by Dumbledore.

Hope 1: Love 0

“There is no shame in what you are feeling Harry,” said Dumbledore’s voice. “On the contrary...the fact that you can feel pain like this is your greatest strength.”
So what exactly is Harry feeling at this moment? Guilt? More than likely:
It was his fault Sirius had died; it was all his fault. If he, Harry, had not been stupid enough to fall for Voldemort’s trick, if he had not been so convinced that what he had seen in his dream was real, etc, etc.
So, guilt. And a whole lot of anger at himself. Harry feels, in an existentialistic way, responsible. Harry cares, and as Dumbledore puts it (pg. 824):
“You care so much you feel as though you will bleed to death with the pain of it.”

and

“Harry, suffering like this proves you are still a man! This pain is part of being human--"

Well, this doesn’t really help my case, as all this lends support for, believe it or not, both love and hope.

“I WANT OUT, I WANT IT TO END, I DON’T CARE ANYMORE--" (pg. 824)

Harry is desperately trying to feel one thing: despair. The complete and utter loss of hope. He wants it to end, he doesn’t want to care, doesn’t want to be human. He wants to give up his life. Dumbledore, of course, knows Harry better than that. Harry does care, and can’t do a thing to stop it. He does have hope. Same goes for love. Harry may not want to love anymore because the loss of love is excruciating.

Hope 2 : Love 1

There is a room in the Department of Mysteries...that is kept locked at all times. It contains a force that is at once more wonderful and more terrible than death, than human intelligence, than forces of nature.
Well, neither life nor death nor natural disaster can destroy love or hope. Both can be terrible as well, as in a battered woman clinging to hope that her batterer will one day love her and stop beating her.

Hope 3 : Love 2

No one can quite explain why they are in love or have hope when there is no logical reason to.

Hope 4 : Love 3

It is also, perhaps, the most mysterious of the many subjects for study that reside there. It is the power held within that room that you possess in such quantities and which Voldemort has not at all.
Voldie has Harry’s protection in him, as he obtained it when he used Harry to get his body back: love. But it’s entirely plausible Voldie’s never really had hope. He either was ridiculously confident he would become the greatest wizard, or has been assured he is the greatest wizard. Overconfidence, rather than hope. Think Emperor in Star Wars. This also explains why, in Book 4:
For a fleeting instant, Harry thought he saw a gleam of something like triumph in Dumbledore’s eyes.
The irrevocable connection was made, with good and evil, love and hate. Dumbledore might know that determining factor could be, and most likely is, something else. Voldie, when given a body with human frailties such as love, is capable of dying.

Hope 5: Love 3

"That power took you to save Sirius tonight. That power also saved you from possession by Voldemort, because he could not bear to reside in a body so full of the force he detests. In the end it mattered not that you could not close your mind. It was your heart that saved you."
Harry hoped he could rescue Sirius; that’s what drove him to the Ministry. Remember Book 2 and Fawkes’ song? How it filled up Harry’s heart, as if the song (of hope, as clarified in Book 4) was inside of him? So, even if the heart is generally used as an acronym for love, in this case in JKR's universe, it could easily mean hope. It also means JKR can sit back, and laugh it up as everyone pats themselves on the back, thinking they’re very clever for coming to the conclusion that it’s love. Remember how she (jokingly of course) remarked about her little faux plot twist with Mark Evans:
"Ha ha! Yes, Mark Evans is back, suckers, and he’s the key to everything!"
Personally, I don’t mind being taken for a “sucker” as the clever surprises never fail to delight me. But I do think JKR takes a certain amount of pleasure in leading readers one way, while actually going the next. It must be insanely amusing, reading all our pathetic attempts at trying to untangle her carefully crafted, misdirecting language. We got plenty of practice with this series. Now it’s time to think like JKR. How would you throw the readers off, now that they’re catching on to you?

So, final tally:

Hope 6 : Love 4

You do the math. You decide because this is, when it all comes down to it, just another pathetic attempt to get to the bottom of a very complicated issue. It could be that I’m making connections where there aren’t any. I mean, if people can see the Virgin Mary in a grilled cheese sandwich, then I’m perfectly capable of inventing signs for seeing evidence of Crumple-Horned Snorkacks in Harry Potter. I wouldn’t be terribly surprised to find that I was wrong. Nor would it surprise me if I was right, to be perfectly honest. But I do hold some misgivings about this perfect little conclusion I’ve drawn together so neatly.

The problem stems from Voldie’s dialogue in Book 4, pp. 654-655:

“And I had given up hope, now, that any of my Death Eaters cared what had become of me.”

“When I had almost abandoned all hope, it happened at last.”

“My last hope for regeneration.”

Three strikes in a row against me, all clumped together, right before he and Harry duel. Yet I’m not sure how to take this. Should I take it that Voldie is an individual capable of understanding his own emotions and therefore his words at face value? Or, is it as a friend explained, Voldie simply used a conventionalized phrase word in a conventional phrase without knowing what the word truly means? An example of this is someone who’s genetically incapable of feeling fear (yes, they exist) might still use the phrase “I’m afraid I don’t have any.” Or when someone is frustrated but says “I’m angry.” Perhaps what he feels is anticipation or even expectation. And I meet plenty of people who use words they don’t know the definition of. And you never know when JKR is just messing with you and trying to throw you off her scent. Or, I could be wrong about everything and thinking too much.

Thus, I have happily presented my alternative. A lovely, plausible alternative and explained my concerns regarding it. I still think it’s a proper theory, as what Tom says doesn’t completely negate my logic. It just throws a wrench in my perfectly logical system. If nothing else, I hope this gets others’ wheels turning. I hope others can dig deep to see if it’s love, hope, or something else I’ve missed entirely which is the Secret Emotion.

1/27/05

Discuss this editorial.





Translate


MuggleNet is an unofficial Harry Potter fan site. Please email us if you have any questions or concerns. MuggleNet's original layouts were designed and created by Navy. All subsequent layouts by Dylan Spartz.

© 1999-2008 MuggleNet.com. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | COPPA Policy | Feedback | Credits
Random Addresses

390 muggles currently online


Poll
Will you be seeing Dan's Broadway Equus performance?

Updates
Today's Updates
· Added a new editorial [October 7]
Recent Updates
· Updated the Caption Contest [October 4]
· Books section reorganized. [September 29]
· Added The Magic Quill #143 [September 28]
Mail

Quotes
I'm not putting them [trousers] on. I like a healthy breeze 'round my privates, thanks.

Archie
Goblet of Fire, Chapter 7, Page 84

See Another Quote
Big News
(9/08) - WB/RDR Trial Verdict: Judge halts Lexicon publication
(8/14) - Half-Blood Prince delayed until July 17th, 2009
(6/11) - JK Rowling's Harry Potter Prequel now online!
(6/10) - Potter Prequel sells for 25k pounds
(5/20) - Scholastic Reveals Sorcerer's Stone Anniversary Edition
(3/16) - MuggleCast #137: Tripping Over Curtains: The Jim Dale Story
Release Dates
Beedle the Bard:
December 4th, 2008
The Exhibition:
Spring 2009
Deathly Hallows paperback:
July 7th, 2009
Half-Blood Prince:
July 17th, 2009
Wizarding World:
2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 1:
November 19, 2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 2:
May 2011

Advertisement




MuggleNet » Fan Site Award Winner