| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood AntagonistAn original editorial by Melissa WalkerHaving recently read and been fascinated by B.J. Texan’s excellent article Machiavelli’s Half-Blood Prince, my mind started wandering down Snape’s road: the road that he is on to achieve not Dumbledore’s ends, not Voldemort’s ends, but only his own ends (Spinner’s End?). I really started considering Snape in Machiavellian terms, as the “Severus” of the Romans. After considering the Machiavelli information, I also began pondering another line of inquiry that is fascinating in terms of Snape. All of the books have at least one major red herring (e.g. Snape/Quirrel, Draco/Riddle, Sirius/Pettigrew, Bagman/Crouch Jr./Mad Eye, Zacharias Smith/Marietta Edgecombe, Slughorn/Snape), and usually several minor ones as well (Harry as the possible heir of Slytherin in CoS, Crookshanks as a possible culprit in PoA, etc.), and our greasy-haired Potions professor set the precedent. (Was anyone not totally convinced on his or her first reading of SS/PS that Snape was the villain?) Rowling has said on more than one occasion that she regards the series as one big, long novel. Considering her love of red herrings, it follows that the series itself contains one big, major red herring. I propose that, based on the Machiavelli information provided by Texan, and Rowling’s consistent and abundant use of red herrings, that she has intentionally set us up to believe that Voldemort is the main antagonist in the story, while all the time brilliantly laying a foundation for Snape to emerge as the primary antagonist, just as Quirrel did in opposite fashion in SS/PS. Let’s look at this proposition objectively: Assume Voldemort is the primary antagonist. I mean, of course he is! We’ve known that since day one! He’s the one who went to Godric’s Hollow to kill the Potters and gave Harry his scar, and set the whole story in motion, right? Oh, wait. What happened before that? Trelawney gave the prophecy to Dumbledore, which was conveniently overheard by Snape. Snape gave pieces of this information to Voldemort, sent Voldemort to Godric’s Hollow, which led to Voldemort’s downfall. Hmm. Snape now, not Voldemort, is the catalyst for the action. Snape is equally to blame for the death of Harry’s parents (from Harry’s perspective, if not Dumbledore’s). And Snape has now, in a sense, been responsible for the (albeit unforeseen and temporary) downfall of Voldemort and the murder of Dumbledore, the two most powerful wizards of the age! So, moving into the present (books 1-6), we see -- or rather see the effects of -- Snape playing Dumbledore and Harry against Voldemort (most noticeably in 5 and 6), like pawns on a wizard’s chess board. And Snape will continue to play Harry against Voldemort in 7, using each to his advantage as much as possible (to find Horcruxes, etc.), until he can move out into the open. (For illustration, think of that brilliant episode of Lost where Sawyer plays Jack and Locke against each other and steals all the guns. Sawyer is Snape’s handsome-Southern-Muggle twin brother.) While Harry clearly fears Voldemort, and each book so far has culminated in a showdown with Voldy or his followers, the tension between Harry and Snape is built up even more consistently, subtly, and on a more intimate level. The relationship between Harry and Snape is extremely personal. They see and converse with each other nearly every day. The animosity between them grows so steadily and persistently that it is like a cancer. So while Harry and Voldemort are certainly locked in their own battle by means of the prophecy, Godric’s Hollow, and the terrible incidents that occur almost annually, I maintain that the most primal and vicious grudge that Harry feels is for Snape: Snape who “sicked” Voldy on his parents, Snape who murdered Dumbledore, Snape who never really stopped being a Death Eater, Snape who goaded Sirius out of hiding to his death, Snape who betrayed him as friend in the form of the “Half-Blood Prince,” Snape who has taunted, belittled, humiliated and insulted Harry since he first laid eyes on him at Hogwarts, Snape who represents everything Harry despises. The “big things” are often easier to get over than the innumerable small abuses. But here’s the clincher: Jo herself stated: Harry-Snape is now as personal, if not more so, than Harry-Voldemort.”Structurally, it makes no sense to have a greater conflict between the protagonist and a supporting character rather than the antagonist. Such a conflict detracts from the effect of the story and distracts the reader. I contend that Jo, usually very protective of her secrets, let a major clue slip here. She is a master storyteller and does not make amateur mistakes in story structure. Therefore, if the conflict between Harry and Snape is greatest (“most personal”), then the only logical conclusion is that Harry and Snape must be the protagonist and antagonist, respectively. I know that this theory is likely to be controversial because it conflicts with all of our previous assumptions. So I have tried to predict what some of the reactions might be, and respond to them now.
After Voldemort’s gone, Harry thinks he can start to breathe easily again, and then -- POW! -- a new battle begins with Snape. Second climax and adrenaline rush for Harry and the reader. ...and... I have no idea how Harry is going to win that battle because you saw how Snape practically ate him for breakfast at the end of HBP. But, since Harry is our hero, and he’s got lots of smart, talented, and loyal friends, I’m sure he’ll prevail, and at least some of the characters will live to move into a better tomorrow.
4/30/06
MuggleNet is an unofficial Harry Potter fan site. Please email us if you have any questions or concerns. MuggleNet's original layouts were designed and created by Navy. All subsequent layouts by Dylan Spartz. © 1999-2008 MuggleNet.com. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | COPPA Policy | Feedback | Credits
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||