Blood - Not Horcruxes

An original editorial by Robert Ogden



We readers have all but decided that Harry must set off and destroy the rest of Voldemort's Horcruxes in Deathly Hallows. This has presented all sorts of problems, which many ingenious editorialists has attempted to solve. My theory is that a proper "magical Horcrux hunt" would take way too long. A short one would be impossible to write properly without some sort of unconvincing plot contrivance. JKR also made a Horcrux hunt the climax of the last book. She probably doesn't want to risk the readers thinking, "it was better last time." What's more, Dumbledore has already gone Horcrux hunting. It took him a great deal of time and required every bit of skill he possessed. This was the greatest wizard in the world. So it's not going to be any easier for Harry. This begs the question: Why do the Horcruxes have to be destroyed?

The answer is obvious. The Horcruxes must be destroyed so the Dark Lord can be killed once and for all. Let us then ask this question: Why must he be killed once and for all? To put it another way: What would happen if Harry went into the final showdown with Voldemort while there were still Horcruxes intact?

To properly answer this question, we must figure out how Horcruxes work. In Half-Blood Prince, Slughorn told us what they are and how they are made, but not how they work. Luckily, we were already unwittingly shown how they work. We got a glimpse in Sorcerer's/Philosopher's Stone, and got the entire answer in book four. To put it succinctly, a Horcrux keeps your soul tied to earth once you die. This would seem to be a fate worse than death, unless there were some way to come back to physical form. In Goblet of Fire, we saw exactly how that process unfolds. Basically, to come back requires one to make a kind of dark magic gumbo that consists of four ingredients: the conscious soul, an ancestor's bone, a loyal servant's flesh, and the blood of your worst enemy. That last one is the most important: the blood of your worst enemy. Voldemort needed Harry Potter's blood.

If we assume that Dumbledore knew that, in order to return, Voldemort would need Harry's blood (a fairly safe assumption), then after the incident at Godric's Hollow, why did he not just go take a thestral ride over the Irish Sea and toss baby Harry in? I don't think it's just because Dumbledore is a nice guy. He's shown that he's perfectly willing to sacrifice for the greater good. Surely his affection for one baby wouldn't keep him from preventing Voldemort's return, which would cost many, many more lives. No, there had to be another reason. I believe it was this: when Voldemort acted on the prophecy, he turned it into one of those binding magical contracts that you cannot escape from. (Think Triwizard Tournament and Unbreakable Vow.) If Voldemort ever did return, the prophecy now guaranteed only one person would be able to stop him: Harry Potter. And at that point, there was another way for him to return, besides getting to Harry's blood: the Philosopher's/Sorcerer's stone. We know he attempted to use that very method.

Fast forward to the end of Harry's first year. The Stone has been destroyed. If Harry were to snuff it at this point, would there be a way for Voldemort to return? Actually, Dumbledore couldn't be sure. Quirrel had been in contact with Harry for a year. It wasn't entirely inconceivable that he had somehow managed to get a little of Harry's blood and store it some place. So Dumbledore was now in a bit of a pickle. He had to keep Harry alive for the day of the final showdown with Voldemort; a day that could only occur because Harry was indeed being kept alive. In the meantime, Voldemort couldn't be killed. In effect, there was a stalemate until that fateful day in the graveyard.

Fast forward again to the end of year four. While Harry is telling Dumbledore what happened in the graveyard, he sees a "gleam of triumph" in his eyes. Why? Simply, Dumbledore now knows Voldemort can be finished off for good. What's more, the elaborate planning that Voldemort went through to nab Harrry made it plain that Quirrel did not ever manage to procure any of Harry's blood.

Fast forward once more to the end of year six. As Harry battles the Death Eaters, Snape does not let them touch him. While some have taken this as "Good Snape" trying to keep Harry safe, if you buy my theory that the prophecy is now a binding magical contract, then his actions are more consistent with "Evil Snape." As others have shown, it's very likely that Snape actually heard the entire prophecy, otherwise Professor Trelawney wouldn't have ever noticed that he was there. Therefore, he knows that "either must die at the hand of the other" (OotP, Chapter 37) and that the Death Eaters will not be able to touch Potter. He tells them not to touch him, not because he wants Harry to be safe, because Harry is not going to die anyway, but because he's worried what will happen to the Death Eaters if they violate the prophecy.

We now return to the question presented earlier: What would happen if Harry went into the final showdown while there were still Horcruxes at large? Two things are possible: Harry could lose (which won't happen), or the Dark Lord could be reduced to Vapormort form. With the Stone gone, if Harry put his blood out of reach, there would be no way for the Dark Lord to rise again. Therefore, to end the series, Harry must step through the veil, thus condemning Voldemort to an eternity of wandering the earth without any hope of returning. Of course, it would still be a good idea to get rid of all those Horcruxes eventually, just to be safe. That sounds like a job for "Ron the Auror," whose Indiana Jones-like Horcrux hunting exploits would no doubt be chronicled by countless fanfic writers who just don?t want this series to end.

03/25/2007

Posted by: Amy

Discuss this editorial.





Translate


MuggleNet is an unofficial Harry Potter fan site. Please email us if you have any questions or concerns. MuggleNet's original layouts were designed and created by Navy. All subsequent layouts by Dylan Spartz.

© 1999-2009 MuggleNet.com. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | COPPA Policy | Feedback | Credits
Random Addresses

375 muggles currently online







Poll
If you had the chance, would you leave your muggle life behind and join the wizarding world?

Updates
Today's Updates
· Updated Crazy Caption Contest [November 1]
· Added Ultimate Edition DVD section [November 1]
· Added MuggleCast Episode 180 Transcript [November 1]
Recent Updates
· Updated Fan Art [October 31]
Mail

Quotes
I want to fix that in my memory forever. Draco Malfoy, the amazing bouncing ferret...

Ron Weasley
Goblet of Fire, Chapter 13, Page 207

See Another Quote
Big News
(10/01) - Happy 10th Birthday, MuggleNet!
(9/30) - HBP breaks $300 million mark in US
(9/25) - JK Rowling is now a Twitter user!
(9/17) - SS and COS Ultimate Editions arriving December 8th too
(9/17) - HBP DVD to hit U.S. stores on December 8
(9/15) - Wizarding World to open Spring 2010, rides confirmed
Release Dates
The Exhibition,
Boston opening:

October 25th, 2009
Half-Blood Prince DVD:
December 8th, 2009
Wizarding World:
Spring 2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 1:
November 19th, 2010
Deathly Hallows, Pt 2:
July 15th, 2011

Advertisement