"The Other" -- The Third Person in the Prophecy

An original editorial by Peregrin




As I havenÂ’t seen this theory posted anywhere, I thought IÂ’d take a moment to share my own thoughts on what seems to be many peopleÂ’s favorite topic: the prophecy at the end of Order of the Phoenix.

My main thought is this: I think there’s a third person hidden in the prophecy, and I think that the third person is Peter Pettigrew. In Val Aug´s editorial, we heard about Pettigrew’s possible involvement in the prophecy, but I see things somewhat differently than Pettigrew being "the one." I think that Pettigrew is "the other" mentioned.

Let´s take this piece by piece.

The first time I read the prophecy, my initial reaction was that it was quite an awkward muddle of writing for someone as brilliant as JK Rowling. Even after rereading the prophecy and Dumbledore’s analysis, I wasn’t convinced. There had to be something else there, something hidden in the prose, like in so many parts of the Harry Potter series. I think Pettigrew is that missing piece and that Dumbledore, in this case, has analyzed something incorrectly. If the prophecy was meant to be taken at face value, it would have been written as such with names mentioned and with the subjects and objects of the sentence more defined. Rowling herself has stated on her site that she “chose the wording very carefully.”

So, breaking it down:

"...and either must die at the hand of the other..."

"Either" always means one out of two things. In this case, I think Voldemort and Harry. But the more important part to this editorial is "...at the HAND of the OTHER."

There is nothing that says "the other" must be Voldemort or Harry. It could be a third person, and because of the mention of the hand, I believe that person to be Pettigrew. Remember a certain magical hand at the end of GoF? Why else would Rowling have worded it this way? Why not say at the WAND of the other or either must KILL the other? There were other ways to word it, but I think Rowling chose this particular method because of PettigrewÂ’s bond with Harry, who saved his life.

With the names inserted, the prophecy would become:

“…and either VOLDEMORT OR HARRY must die at the hand of PETTIGREW, for neither VOLDEMORT NOR HARRY can live while PETTIGREW survives…”

I think weÂ’re going to (forgive me) have a Star Wars-esque moment where Pettigrew must choose between killing either Harry or Voldemort -- and of course, choosing Voldemort -- before perhaps dying himself in the process of destroying such a powerful wizard. I do hope that Rowling will put more into it to make it more original, but thatÂ’s just my guess.

As for "...neither can live while the other survivesÂ…," IÂ’m less certain.

"Neither can live..." It initially sounded to me (and to other fans, apparently) like both Harry and Voldemort must die. But I donÂ’t think Harry will die. Why? Because, although itÂ’s easy to forget, this is still technically a kidÂ’s series, during which the hero is rarely killed. Plus, the entire series to this point, with the exception of the first chapter of SS/PS, has been from HarryÂ’s point of view. The first chapter of Goblet of Fire, if you recall, Harry saw in a nightmare. So, he was still involved. How would Rowling wrap up the odds and ends at the end of the book if her narrator was dead?

So, going again with Pettigrew being substituted in place of "the other," I see it like this:

Harry can´t live if Pettigrew survives in two possible scenarios.

  1. In the emotional sense, Pettigrew being the betrayer of HarryÂ’s parents.
  2. In the physical sense with Pettigrew being VoldemortÂ’s messenger and lapdog.

Voldemort canÂ’t live because Pettigrew is bound to Harry through what I believe to be an extention of that hidden power in the Department of Mysteries -- love. Hear me out; it took something to let Pettigrew live. Hatred leads to murder. In reverse, love led to his survival. Not HarryÂ’s love for Pettigrew, heavens no, but his love for Lupin and Sirius, two of his mentors, who he did not want to see as murderers.

So there are my thoughts. Take them or leave them as you will. But I donÂ’t believe for a moment that the prophecy simply means weÂ’ll get a Voldemort vs. Harry showdown at the end. It will be much more complex than that.

9/11/04

 
What are you looking forward to this summer?

 

LeakyCon Portland
QuidCon 2013
Joe Moses One Man Showses Tour
LeakyCon London

 

October 1999 - J.K. Rowling begins a 3-week book tour of the United States where she promotes Prisoner of Azkaban and meets with fans. Each tour stop is packed with attendees, and the first sign of a huge upcoming fandom appears.
 
 

Question : Who is Professor of Astronomy at Hogwarts?
 
Professor Vector
Professor Burbage
Professor Sinestra
 

Messing up your hair because you think it looks cool to look like you've just got off your broomstick, showing off with that stupid Snitch, walking down corridors and hexing anyone who annoys you just because you can — I'm surprised your broomstick can get off the ground with that fat head on it. You make me SICK.

Lily Evans
Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 28, Page 648
Shirley Henderson was aged 35 at the time that she first played Moaning Myrtle, she is the oldest actor to play a Hogwarts student in the Harry Potter films.
 
 
Jason Isaacs' Birthday
June 6, 2013

OoTP (book) 10 Year Anniversary
June 21, 2013

Dudley Dursley's Birthday
June 23, 2013

LeakyCon Portland
June 27-30, 2013

Dobby's Birthday
June 28, 2013
Username :
Password :
 Sign Up
 Forgot Password ?
 
 
V-Day2013 Option II   VDay2013   holidays2012   MuggleNet OWL Exams  
April Fool's Day 2012   GilderoyVDay   Happy Holidays 2011   Pottermore: Slytherin  
Pottermore: Hufflepuff   Pottermore: Ravenclaw   Pottermore: Gryffindor   Quidditch World Cup  
Halloween 2011   DHnagini   DHelderwand   DH2cast  
DH1Trio   DH Voldemort   DH_Trio   Deathly Hallows - Hermione  
Burning Hogwarts   Wizarding World   Draco   Half-Blood Prince Trio  
Harry   Hermione   LEGO Harry Potter  
 
 
  Twitter   Facebook   RSS   Tumblr