Andrew: So, getting into the Gringotts scene, Hermione - we were both impressed, I think, by Bellatrix playing Hermione playing Bellatrix...
Andrew: ...if that makes sense.
Eric: It was weird. It was a short scene, I would have liked that scene to be a little longer, the build up, I think, because of all of a sudden Hermione is walking up the hill and it's actually Helena Bonham Carter. But I thought at first that Hermione just hadn't changed yet because Helena Bonham Carter has matched Emma Watson to the point where you're looking at Helena Bonham Carter's face and it looks - she looks like Emma Watson.
Eric: I couldn't distinguish the two, I really felt that it was Emma Watson when it was [laughs] clearly Helena Bonham Carter. I don't know how better to say that.
Andrew: No, you're right. I felt the same way, and they even - another kind of fun book moment that they included was when Hermione, as Bellatrix, says good morning to somebody...
Andrew: ...in Diagon Alley and - is it Ron or Harry or Griphook? One of them says...
Eric: Yeah, Griphook.
Andrew: ..."Why are you being so polite? You're Bellatrix, don't forget".
Andrew: And then she turns bitchy.
Andrew: So, that was - see, that's a fun moment that makes sense because it's in the book and...
Andrew: If that makes sense.
Eric: Yeah. So, Gringotts - the - everything from the mine cart ride, which was partially completed, to the dragon and the vault. What did you think about that? But also when they got in the vault, what did you think of the vault scene? Because that is a scene that is a little bit different than in the book, as well.
Andrew: I liked it. And actually I was pretty impressed by the multiplying gold, the way it was animated, the way the gold actually multiplies in the vault is how I think you would expect it to work when you're reading the book. And I thought that was - so I was impressed by that. The one thing that doesn't happen is, like in the book, the gold is very hot.
Andrew: And I don't remember hearing any lines - anyone being, like, "Owww! It's hot". [laughs] So...
Eric: Right. Right, right, right. I think...
Andrew: Not necessary...
Andrew: ...but just a little change.
Eric: Yeah, kind of claustrophobic in the book, too, with the vault being closed, and everything is hot and heated. It's kind of scary. But the multiplier does serve the purpose of being an enchantment that prevents people from stealing, obviously, and it is an adequate obstacle for Harry. He's got enough going on because Griphook wants the sword in exchange for even breaking them in in the first place. So, they've got a lot to deal with and I do like the scene, and the escape on the dragon is great.
Andrew: And film viewers actually don't know that Griphook wants the sword until it actually happens in the film, whereas in the book you know it ahead of time.
Eric: Well, that's not true, they totally argue for it when they are back at Shell Cottage.
Andrew: Oh, but you don't know why. It's not explained why in the film, why Griphook wants it. In the book they get into the...
Eric: Goblin-made - oh.
Andrew: ...goblin lore, they're very possessive of their items.
Andrew: So, they didn't get into that. But...
Eric: They just didn't mention Godric Gryffindor. Yeah, there's a line in the book - I think he says, "Just because Gryffindor owned it doesn't make it his," where it's, like, because it's made by goblins they believe it's theirs. But I think something to those - to that effect is stated. I just think things are happening a little fast in the vault.
Andrew: Yeah, so I think the vault was good. I don't think we could fairly review it yet because actually a lot of the special effects in that scene weren't complete yet.
Andrew: And I think it's going to look better than when we saw it.
Eric: But just from the reactions of the goblins when the dragon escapes, I think that's going to be - I mean, that's a heck of a bang to start the film off on and, of course, they go straight from there to Hogwarts pretty much with very little downtime. It's an action packed film.
Andrew: The Aberforth stuff - again it's a pretty - it's a good scene. There is some stuff cut down from the book and sorry I keep comparing it to the book so much but personally I can't help it. [laughs] I feel like we've been doing it for so long...
Andrew: ...comparing it to the book that we've just got to keep on doing that. But Aberforth, great role, great performance, I thought. They meet just like how they do in the book, Aberforth lets them into his place, and we do get to hear about Ariana but as you noted here there's no talk about how she actually died.
Eric: Yeah, there isn't but at the same time, Aberforth and Harry do talk at length about why Harry trusts Dumbledore and how Albus Dumbledore is not trustworthy. And Aberforth talks about him being lustful for power, and I think that it's really effective to the point where Harry in the film says, "Look, I don't care what happened between you and your brother. I trust Dumbledore," and it's really, really an interesting scene. Emotional, where you can tell - Ciar·n Hinds's acting where it's like he's kind of hurt by Harry saying that he's given up and strives to prove him wrong by competing in the final battle. So, it's pretty emotional, pretty emotional all around. Emotions, tempers are flying, I think. No goats, though. There is an absence of goats, aren't there?
Andrew: [laughs] I think you're right but maybe that's because the special effects aren't complete...
Andrew: ...but let's not get our hopes up. [laughs] So, Neville - you see Neville come through the portrait, Ariana brings him. You see the Room of Requirement and there's a scene coming up now - we're in the Room of Requirement, Ginny enters and says that Snape knows that Harry is in the castle. Now here's where things start diverting from the book. What happens is Snape summons all the students into the Great Hall and Harry decides to go with everybody, and he puts on his robes to blend in and goes to this meeting that's being held in the Great Hall. Snape does a speech in front of everyone saying we think Harry is here, if anyone is caught working with him, helping him - what was the threat? You will be...
Eric: A punishment befitting your treason, so basically the severity to which you help - the degree to which you help Harry is going to be the degree to which you're punished. And also he says knowledge about his whereabouts as well are - you're going to be punished equally. So, he basically - I mean, he threatens - he calls the whole student body - as headmaster, he calls the whole student body out of bed to the Great Hall and makes these threats, and Harry is not standing for it.
Andrew: And so Harry jumps out of the crowd and this reminded me of The Dark Knight, when the Joker is walking with all the other police officers and sort of...
Andrew: ...jumps out and starts shooting everyone.
[Andrew and Eric laugh]
Andrew: That's what this reminded me of because they're all in orderly lines like that. So, Harry and Snape begin to duel, McGonagall jumps in, helps Harry, and Harry and McGonagall force Snape out, and Snape flees and he does turn into the bat-like figure.
Andrew: And now, so what obviously has been cut here is Harry does not go into the Ravenclaw common room to go looking for the mysterious Ravenclaw-related Horcrux.
Eric: Right, and David Heyman just spoke about that today. One of Micah's reports - and he mentioned this specifically where Snape and McGonagall fighting does not take place while Harry is on his way to the Ravenclaw common room. Instead, it takes place in this Great Hall scene, and I think, again, it makes perfect sense in the film. I'm not going to complain about the difference between the book in this particular instance because I think it's really moving where Harry is - at first confronts Snape, says, "How dare you stand where he stood," meaning Dumbledore, and Snape is about to attack Harry, and McGonagall has to intervene. I think even what they did with the Slytherin students, like Pansy Parkinson says, "Somebody, grab him," meaning Harry, and then the Order, who has just arrived, encloses around him, protecting him. I think it's great character moments, and I think that that's what - if you're alone in a Hogwarts corridor and suddenly there's a Snape-shaped hole in the wall as it was in the book, it doesn't mean as much.
Andrew: And honestly, I actually - I didn't like it at first, but afterward I came to realize that - I was thinking about it a lot. [laughs] I couldn't stop thinking about that scene, and it is pretty cool to watch Snape and McGonagall duel, and Harry and all the students around. Yeah, so that's one of the first big changes and it did end up working, I think we...
Andrew: ...both agree.
Eric: So, I think instead of going exactly scene by scene, because there's a lot that happens at Hogwarts, we should talk about more - and also for time saving, we should spoil sort of specifics, just specifics of what comes to mind about Voldemort and - what did you think about Voldemort in this film?
Andrew: You know what? I brought this up - he - I brought this up to you the other day. I realized that he does have a huge presence in this movie and you're kind of not used to it. But of course, it fits so well, and by that I mean - in other films you only see him a couple of times, where in this one he's in a good probably hour or more of it. And it's great to see him in action and Ralph Fiennes does an amazing job. There are a couple of scenes that bothered me, and there's this one that - and this is another big change and this is kind of jumping ahead. It is when Harry - at one point, Harry and Voldemort run into each other. And Harry pulls him off a ledge, a cliff, and they start basically flying around in the air, and at one point their faces merge. And the special effects weren't complete on that yet, but that's definitely what was going on. And it was just weird and it was kind of hard to follow, at least the first time watching it, maybe just because the special effects weren't complete. But I was really taken aback by it because they spend a lot of time being really close to each other, and I was just thinking, like - first of all, it's gross that Voldemort is so close to Harry, it was just grossing me out.
Andrew: And also, if they were ever really that close to each other, one of them would have killed the other!
Eric: Well, no, they're in a headlock! A headlock - a battle of wills, at that point.
Andrew: It just doesn't make sense for these two huge enemies to be this close to each other and not...
Eric: I think that's what's special about it. I think because they have such a - they're such opposites that for - and they've hunted each other for eight years or whatever, and I think Voldemort has spent the last couple of hours in the film being more and more weak, more and more vulnerable, that really when it comes time to duel Harry, it's a fist fight is what it is, it's more so than even magic. It's - Harry grabs Voldemort and says, "Let's finish this like we started it - together," pulls him off the cliff, and obviously Voldemort wants to not die so he starts flying, and Harry's grabbing onto him, and they're both just wrestling in the air. It's awesome! And it's a great way to show Hogwarts from above, but that's just my opinion. And I think - but when their faces merge, as you said - and it was completely not a finished effect, but you could tell that that's the idea that's going to be in the film. I thought that was fascinating because it reminded me of Movie 5, when Dumbledore and Voldemort are fighting at the very end in the Ministry. Voldemort disappears and is all of a sudden actually no longer a physical presence but begins to possess Harry. And it's the idea that Voldemort is such a powerful dark wizard that he can just leave his body or no longer be rooted to the physical plane where he can begin to possess Harry. Or that they're fighting so closely that they're like one, almost, that it's like this intrinsic battle of good and evil. I just thought that the imagery, everything - I liked everything about that.
Andrew: I'm going to reserve more judgement...
Eric: But I can see where it's...
Andrew: Yeah, because it is such a departure from the books, and I just don't like how they are so close to each other for that long period of time. It's just - it doesn't feel right. But I'll reserve final judgment until the special effects are complete because a lot of that wasn't.
Eric: But did you think that Voldemort - as a separate topic, did you think that Voldemort in this film was a compelling villain?
Andrew: Yes. Yeah, I would say so. Why not?
Eric: Okay - no, I'm just wondering...
Andrew: I mean...
Eric: ...because the problem is we've...
Andrew: Well, what do you mean? [laughs]
Eric: Okay, so we've seen so little of him in previous films, we said this. Maybe - I mean, he's like the villain of the series, the main villain. He's on all the promotional posters, "You will lose everything," but he's only in five minutes of the film towards the end and always thwarted. This is the first movie where we see him, how he thinks, how he commands his armies. The victory speech when he believes that Harry is dead is such insight into Ralph Fiennes playing Voldemort that it's amazing. But I think the problem is with this film you have to believe that there's a chance - just like in the book, you have to believe there's a chance that Harry could lose. And so, does the film make you think that?
Andrew: No. [laughs]
Eric: Okay, okay.
Andrew: I mean, I guess I don't know how - I really don't know how anyone could watch this and think that Harry would lose.
Andrew: You know what I mean?
Eric: But I guess - okay, so what I should ask then is, is Voldemort at least interesting to watch?
Andrew: Yeah. Yes.
Eric: Because you see so much more of him...
Eric: ...and I think, you know, you love to hate him, almost.
Andrew: Yeah, and Ralph Fiennes does a good job in portraying the role, but like I mentioned before, you would assume that if Ralph - or that if Voldemort was getting this close to Harry, he was going to kill him. He wasn't going to roll down a hill and put each other in a headlock. Again, that didn't make sense.
Eric: [laughs] Well, a lot of it is chasing. They are throwing spells at each other the whole time when they chase through Hogwarts. But yeah, I think Voldemort in the books, maybe in a different way in Book 7, was beginning to lose his way, was beginning to kind of - not panic, but he made a lot of silly decisions, I think, at the end with how to handle everything. And I think in the film it's a lot more cat-and-mouse chasing, just chasing across - I guess it makes for more of a spectacle and maybe that's why I shouldn't like it. But...
Andrew: It probably is spectacle, yeah.
Eric: Yeah, but I think, definitely, I understand what you're saying. Changing the topic a little bit, what about Snape?
Andrew: Snape was great.
Eric: Yeah, okay.
Andrew: Particularly "The Prince's Tale." Now admittedly, I had to run to the bathroom a couple of minutes into "The Prince's Tale," and I did it at that point because - I know I'm analyzing my bathroom run, it's kind of weird.
Andrew: But I did it then because I didn't want to miss the end, of course, I didn't want to miss Harry, and so I thought, "Well, if I'm going to miss something, I'll miss 'The Prince's Tale.'" But actually, I went to the bathroom and I came back, and "The Prince's Tale" scene [laughs] was still going on.
Andrew: And so what you can take away from that is it's a good few minutes...
Andrew: and it's a lot of scenes.
Eric: Unlike "Snape's Worst Memory" in Order of the Phoenix, which we were so happy they cast - Warner Bros. revealed the casting of young James Potter, young Sirius Black, young Peter Pettigrew, young Remus Lupin, young Lily Potter, for all of the thirty seconds of, like, half - a light shining on the tree, on the Marauders laughing, that we saw in the finished product of the film. This is much different, this is - and not only for the large part because a lot has to happen, but it's also a lot of adult acting as well. Michael Gambon as Dumbledore and Snape discussing Harry being a Horcrux or discussing Snape's love for Lily and trying to get...
Eric: ...Voldemort to protect Lily. All of that is in this tale and it is, as you say, a good length. I think that's probably the best example of how long it is, [laughs] to be honest.
Andrew: And my favorite scenes in the tale were Snape - seeing Snape vulnerable. And by that, I mean particularly the scenes with Dumbledore when Snape - you see him looking so desperate and upset over the situation with Harry and Lily, and it really brings out this side of this character which you have never seen before.
Eric: Yeah, yeah. And I think it's this - [laughs] I told this to Micah, but what you missed was actually - there's a line in there where Snape - just like in the book, he says to Dumbledore straight out, "You're raising him like a pig for slaughter."
Eric: [laughs] And I just thought to myself, "Yes!"
Andrew: No way!
Eric: He says that to him!
Andrew: He's a pig for slaughter?
Eric: He says "pig for slaughter". If they cut it from the final film, I'm going to be so upset because I'm fairly certain...
Andrew: We did a whole episode on...
Andrew: ..."pig for slaughter"!
Eric: On "pig for slaughter", as a term about Dumbledore treating Harry and nobody is going to believe me if it's not in the final film, but I swear - and I think I remember it being in the book, but particularly in the film, Alan Rickman asks Michael Gambon, "You're raising him like a pig for slaughter," and I just thought to myself, "Yes!" It was amazing because we did that on MuggleCast, but that was a personal triumph.
Andrew: Yeah, that was one of our best episodes. By the way, that was Episode 116, I just looked it up real quick.
Eric: 116. Yeah, and it was kind of a couple of months after Book 7 and we were trying to figure out how to analyze it, and I think it was right after the revelation that Dumbledore was gay. Or maybe - no, that was 117.
Andrew: It was around that time.
Eric: Right before.
Eric: So, it was right before that revelation and we really analyzed Dumbledore's motivations, so it was a really good episode. But Snape - Dumbledore - what about Dumbledore in this film?
Andrew: Yeah, again, I thought - well, I mean, it was really good to see him. I don't think you see him at all in Part 1, maybe a flashback. You see him in Part 2. You see a lot of him in Part 2. Particularly, I enjoyed "King's Cross".
Andrew: A very bright scene, just Harry and Dumbledore and the shriveled-up Voldemort baby thing under the bench. It looked great. Harry was not naked like he is in the book.
Andrew: And that was to Eric's disappointment, but I said, "Eric, it's okay, you can go watch some Equus videos on YouTube if you want to see Dan -" I'm just kidding. It was a good scene! And the other time you see Dumbledore is "The Prince's Tale", like we mentioned before.
Andrew: So, were you pleased with Michael Gambon in this film?
Eric: I was, I really, really was, and I think a lot of it has to do with the balance that Dan and Michael have found in sort of portraying these characters, particularly in "King's Cross" where Harry keeps asking Dumbledore questions. It gives Dumbledore - it's kind of humorous, but it also gives Gambon something to be - he is able to be wise and answer the questions, and I think the way the scene is written is meant to be very - it suits Michael Gambon's strong points as Dumbledore, where he can be both kind of guiding but also very - I want to say supportive, maybe. I don't quite know what I'm getting at except I will answer your question by saying...
Eric: ...that "King's Cross" is probably one of the, if not the stand out scene for me in the film, and not the least because of that baby thing which is breathing in and out the whole time the scene is going on.
Eric: You can hear this raspy breathing, and it's ominous and really kind of deranged. And the other thing about "King's Cross" is that it's this afterlife sequence, and for viewers of the film who have seen seven films and now most of the eighth film of Harry Potter being set in the real world - the films made the wizarding world a real deal, a real thing. And now, for us to see this brightly lit "King's Cross" afterlife like it was in the book, where you have to realize that it's really happening to whatever extent it's in Harry's head, to see it on film was even more special, I think...
Andrew: It was.
Eric: ...because it's kind of like any - not science-fiction film, but any film where we're meant to believe the fantastical. We were meant to believe that all over again because now we're talking about heaven or purgatory or something else like that, it was just really interesting to see. It's one thing to see the ghosts in the forest in the "Resurrection Stone" scene, because we're used to seeing ghosts in Harry's world. But to see Harry in the ghost world as a flip side of that was really unique and I really liked that about "King's Cross".
Andrew: And comparing it to the book again, those very great lines in the book are there in the film. The one in particular that stood out to me was Harry saying, "Is this all in my head?" or "Is this real?" and Dumbledore says...
Eric: "Of course it's happening," yeah...
Andrew: "Of course it's in your head..."
Eric: "Why on earth should that mean that it's not real?"
Andrew: "Not real," yeah.
Andrew: So, that was in there and I think that's the last piece of dialogue that happens. And yeah, so that was good. Now, one important scene, I think, that we haven't touched on is Harry and Voldemort's actual final duel, and like we have seen in the Part 1 and 2 trailer that was released a long time ago at this point, they're not dueling in the Great Hall.
Andrew: And that was kind of a worry of some people, I know we voiced some concern because that's the scene of the entire series, Harry finally defeating Voldemort, and I have to say, I don't think it was bad. I think it was really good. The students are not around, they do come in after - or actually, do they come in? No, I don't think people come in at all.
Eric: No, we thought they'd come up late, yeah, but they don't and I think the reason for that, too - I mean, a lot of students have died, too, at this point, where we've basically seen Hogwarts students having to carry dead bodies of other Hogwarts students around. And also, the Great Hall becomes a refuge for that. We've already - they basically used the Great Hall to stack the bodies of people, so to have that and then the final battle, final, final confrontation in there, would have been a little crowded. I mean, the Great Hall...
Andrew: That's true.
Eric: ...perhaps in the film is not as big as it is in the books, but I think because the Great Hall is kind of like the medi-ward of this film, of this battle, that is the reason for the change. But that said, Bellatrix and Molly do confront each other in the Great Hall.
Andrew: Yes. And that scene - I liked it, it's not like the sound clips [laughs] that we play from the audiobooks on the show.
Eric: [laughs] It's not all caps. It is more...
Andrew: It is different. Mrs. Weasley, I would say, is more firm.
Eric: Yeah, more firm about it than crazy. But it does happen, and Bellatrix is given an end. But - so that does happen. Now Voldemort and Harry's final moments - now, he does call him Tom, but it's earlier on when he's sort of face-to-face with him, as Andrew said, kind of up close, physically close to him without killing him. They're very - I wish I could find better words for that, but they're very interesting adversaries to see them just dealing with one another. But he does call him Tom at one point, not sort of at the end, but it is revealed - the ownership, the Elder Wand, and things like that are all revealed. And I think it plays more or less like it does in the book but obviously in the new location because by this point they have gone all throughout Hogwarts. I mean, Hogwarts is wrecked.
Andrew: And like you mentioned earlier, you do see a ton of Hogwarts, which is really cool, several sweeping wide shots of the castle. Unfortunately, many of the special effects were not complete...
Eric: But things like stairwells. Like, a lot of battles - like, even the scenes with the snake that occur on the stairwells is very interesting. And Harry even at one point goes up to the Divination Tower when Luna is chasing him and they both see this shield being brought around Hogwarts. Let's talk about that, the shield, actually, because that's not in the book...
Andrew: Well, I mean, they put a shield over the castle, don't they?
Andrew: I think they...
Andrew: Yeah, yeah.
Eric: It's a magical shield, but it's never meant to be literal, to be seen, I don't think.
Andrew: Yeah, of course. So, they did it in the movie, of course, you do see it. And it's cool how it's set up. A few of the teachers go outside and start casting the shield charm and basically it's this mini montage of the three or four teachers out there all reciting the same spell, and I think that added a little epic-ness to it because you see them kind of uniting and building this...
Andrew: ...giant, important forcefield.
Eric: Yeah, what I really liked was the buildup of that shield and also the fortifying of Hogwarts, McGonagall and the two giant statues, but also Voldemort trying to take down the shield, where he's lost yet another Horcrux, I forget which one, it might be the cup or the tiara, and he's really angry now and he says, "I have to get -" he basically knows he has to break the shield. He puts all his effort into using his Elder Wand, the Elder Wand practically cracks and breaks, not to spoil anything, but - because he is single-handedly destroying the shield and it's just - he's such a powerful, dark wizard that he's able to begin the deconstruction of the shield, more so than any of his followers were. But he's so compelling, I think, in his - his mortality is a huge theme of the film, obviously, but I think it's done really well.
Andrew: Yeah. What else? I mean, I think we've covered many of the big things.
Eric: Yeah, all the big things. I think there'll be specifics out there that people will write in and want to know, and I think we'll handle those on a case-by-case - maybe not on the show even. Andrew Yeah.
Andrew: Of course our actual film review show, we're going to have a lot to say.
Eric: Oh yeah!
Andrew: I do have to say right now, one of the more emotional scenes, we talked about Eric kind of sniffling a little bit...
Andrew: ...was when - after "The Prince's Tale", when Harry realizes what must be done.
Eric: Oh, yeah.
Andrew: And they give time for that, you see Harry sort of walk in a trance and he sits down on the steps in Dumbledore's office, and he comes to the realization of what he has to do. And it was really well done because there is that time, he has that time to sit there and think about it. You don't hear anything, you just see him thinking.
Eric: About having to sacrifice himself, about having to die. And...
Eric: ...when he says goodbye to Ron and Hermione, and it's finally goodbye, it felt real and it felt like the book. It felt like it did in the book where these characters - actually, that is where it was easiest to cry, I think, because what I thought of immediately when they're - it takes place on the steps, when Harry actually says goodbye to Ron and Hermione. And because the steps were in such disarray, there were all these shattered bricks and broken brick fragments of the steps, and the halls of Hogwarts there, I was reminded immediately of the chessboard and that scene in Movie 1. Not just Book 1, but Movie 1 in particular where they're so young and Ron has just been injured, and Hermione urges Harry to go forward and...
Andrew: Oh yeah, that's a great point.
Eric: ...where she says, "Books and cleverness," and there's that tender moment between Harry and Hermione. I was immediately brought back to that in this scene for Movie 7 and I think that that was what made me really start to tear up, was seeing how much older they are now.
Andrew: Okay. Well, I think that's about it for now. Like I said, we're going to have more to talk about in the future and this is a good time to plug LeakyCon because...
Andrew: ...of course, we're going to be doing our big movie review episode there. And so if you'd like to be a part of that, you can go to LeakyCon.com, and there you'll find information about the fan conference that's going to be held from July 13th to the 17th in Orlando, Florida. We're going to be doing a couple of podcasts there, and if you register for the conference you'll be able to attend them. And we'll be doing our movie review episode like I said and of course, we'll be taking questions and comments from the audience. I'm sure everybody is going to have a lot to say about it. And I'm looking at the countdown now, and there's 99 days left [laughs] until the start of LeakyCon.
Eric: To LeakyCon, look at that!
Andrew: So, that means, like, 101 days until the film is released, which is crazy to think.
Andrew: We're going to have to make a news post on MuggleNet tomorrow, "100 days until it ends!"
Eric: Until it ends. It all ends in 100 days. That's what we'll have to do.
Andrew: Yep. Yeah, definitely. And if you do register, just use referral code "Muggle" and that way we'll know that you're coming. And we can't wait to see everybody, it's going to be a great time, and more details coming up in the future.
Eric: Cool! Let's take...
Andrew: You want to just wrap it?
Eric: No, let's take some Muggle Mail. That way we can do it...
Andrew: Okay, sure.
Eric: We can do it in, like, ten minutes...
Andrew: All right.
Eric: ...and then we'll be done.
Andrew: Let's do some Muggle Mail. Go ahead, Eric, take this first one.
Eric: Our first one is from Amber T. from Alameda, California. Subject is "Dan's Acting."
"Hi MuggleCasters, this e-mail is a bit out of the blue, however I had an epiphany moment and I thought I'd share. There's always been the discussion about Dan Radcliffe's acting in the film series, maybe that it is a little woody or the emotion is at times forced. Personally, I think Dan the person is an inspiring young man, very wise and good-humored for his age. However, I have always agreed that, of all the young actors in the film, it was Harry's character that felt the worst acted. But I had a realization recently: Dan was so funny on Extras, he is amazing in How to Succeed in Business, and he's so charismatic and witty in interviews. Why do I love him so much as everything but Harry Potter? I'm going to be controversial and blame the writers. Harry's character is so linguistically predictable in every film, he hasn't had a defined character arch in the series, and they passed by lots of chances to give him things to do and instead gave him nothing to do but stare in a fireplace or look out a window. Sure, book Harry may have done stuff like that, but this is a film and the audience should feel more connected to the main character than they do at this point in the series. Think about it, guys. Do you really feel for Harry in the film like you did for Harry in the book? I don't, but I don't blame Dan. The writers of the film series made us a wooden hero. Just venting, lots of love and pickles."
Andrew: I think she actually brings up a very fair argument there. And I also think you may have a changed - well, you may not have that opinion when you watch Part 2 and I think back again to that scene after "The Prince's Tale" where you really get a few moments with Harry, and see his realization and reaction. And also when he's talking to his parents and Sirius in the forest...
Andrew: ...right before approaching Voldemort.
Andrew: There's some time there that you really get to see his character.
Eric: Yeah. I think, too, that - in contrast with previous films comes as a direct result of them saying, "We need to make this film in two parts," where they're going to have all this extra time to do things like show Harry maturing, which is kind of - in previous films, I kind of agree with her that it's his age and his maturity, is all kind of implied to be happening sort of behind the scenes because all we see is him react to all these extraneous forces that are happening to him. But this time, he's really got to come to the realization that he has to die and for that to mean anything, you've actually got to spend some time watching him behave and be the character of Harry. So, I think it's probably very plausible what she wrote in about, but in Movie 2 I think it will be Dan's best performance as Harry.
Andrew: Next e-mail's from Mariam, 19, of Toronto. She writes:
"Hey guys, I love, love, love the show! I just wanted to suggest/correct a few things. Not to sound like a know-it-all, but it was mentioned that if Dumbledore had given Lord Voldemort the Defense against the Dark Arts, he - Dumbledore - would meet his downfall much sooner due to the prophecy. When Lord Voldemort seeks the position the prophecy had not yet been made. I don't think Harry was even born. Also mentioned was why Lord Voldemort hadn't gone seeking the Horcruxes to resurrect himself. In the series it was mentioned that to reattach one self's soul via Horcruxes you have to feel remorse for the death committed to first create the Horcrux, and the remorse felt would probably be the death of you. That being said, going after the Horcruxes wouldn't be an ideal way for Lord Voldemort to resurrect himself. Thanks for being so awesome! Mariam."
So, thank you, Mariam, for those corrections.
Eric: I mean, I think what Mariam said about - well, who - which one of said that Lord Voldemort would...
Andrew: I guess Micah, because I didn't say it.
Eric: Interesting. Okay. But yeah, and I think the Horcruxes - the interesting thing about the Horcruxes is that the diary, for example, was kind of a reincarnation of Voldemort or it wasn't the Voldemort we know being revived, but it was very - it came very close to being a full-fledged, even worse teenage Voldemort, I guess, when he was sapping Ginny's power. So, it was interesting that the Horcruxes can kind of act independently and be - each be sort of as threatening of Voldemort as the real deal who once inhabited the body. So, that's what I thought when reading this e-mail. But the next one comes from Leah, 22, from Malibu, California. She says:
"Hi MuggleCast, I'm a long-time listener and wanted to reply to Micah's question from Episode 223's Chapter-by-Chapter segment. Micah asked if there was any religious symbolism/parallels in the graveyard scene. Yes, there absolutely were. The graveyard scene evokes twisted eucharistic imagery. In the Christian paradigm, Jesus willingly gave flesh and blood - symbolized by bread and wine in the Christian communion ritual - in a self-sacrificial act. Voldemort, as an idolatrous - in that he's self-obsessed - anti-Christ figure, is resurrected by a backwards ritual, blood and flesh taken, not given."
That's very interesting. She says:
"I also had a thought about your question as to Wormtail's ability, as a weak character, to cast the 'Avada Kedavra' spell. I was reminded of the look of revulsion on Snape's face when he AK'd Dumbledore, and perhaps, most likely, that revulsion was self-directed. Snape 'meant it' when he killed Dumbledore because his hatred was genuine, Snape hates himself. I don't think I'm far off the mark by guessing that Wormtail also experiences this self-revulsion when he kills Cedric. Here, Wormtail is virtually Voldemort's slave, constantly demeaned, and only sticking around because he is too afraid to do otherwise. It's likely that Snape and Wormtail were able to project their self-hatred onto Dumbledore and Cedric, and therefore summon enough meaning to administer the Killing Curse. Thanks, love the show! Best wishes, Leah."
What do you think about that? Obviously, you guys did talk about that on the last show.
Andrew: God, I don't know. She's right. [unintelligible]
[Andrew and Eric laugh]
Andrew: Yeah, there were some interesting parallels there, I'm trying to remember if I brought this up. But yeah, I particularly like the point about the look of the revulsion on Snape's face...
Eric: Yeah, I think...
Andrew: ...when he AK'd Dumbledore.
Eric: I think, though, when it comes to Snape, my thoughts are that he is genuinely angry at Dumbledore. He almost doesn't need to be angry or disgusted with himself. He is angry that Dumbledore is making him kill him.
Andrew: And the final e-mail today comes from John Spencer, 19, of Atlanta, Georgia:
"Hey guys, I was just listening to Episode 223 when you were talking about the 'Obliviate' spell, and how it seemed some memory modifications could be reversed and some couldn't. Micah mentioned that these differences could be because of the caster's intent, but I think it's deeper than that. There are plenty of discrepancies when it comes to spell casting in the HP series: Patronuses can be conjured to send messages as well as fight Dementors, though I doubt their incantation is any different. We have seen characters use the Disarming Charm to both make a weapon fly from their hands and to hurl them across a room. I think spells are very flexible, wizards can manipulate them within certain parameters. My guess for memory modification is that (1) it may be easier for the witch or wizard who did the spell to undo it, and (2) the spell could have been applied to varying strengths and after a certain point, it becomes dangerous to remove it without damaging the person whose memory has been modified."
I like that second point, in particular, so maybe the longer you are doing it, the worst it gets.
Eric: Mhm. I think it's more to do - personally, I feel like it's more about what you're covering up. If you're covering up something like a murder, it's going to be - it's going to take a stronger spell to make that person...
Andrew: Now, why is that? Isn't that you just judging that a murder is worst than any other memory?
Eric: Well, to be perfectly honest, a murder is what splits the soul and creates Horcruxes. I mean...
Eric: ...there is canonical...
Andrew: But Voldemort doesn't have a problem with it.
Eric: ...references. No, but he's splitting his soul every time he does it. I think the difference is - well, Gilderoy Lockhart, for instance, said - a quote from him is that he's particularly good at Memory Charms. I think there is a certain skill, a learned skill that will allow you to cast them and make them kind of last for longer. I think it has to do with - weaker witches or wizards aren't able to do Memory Charms that are covering up something really bad, or last forever. And I think that that's really important. Also, Bathilda - no, I'm sorry. Baggins? No, not Baggins. Bagshot? No, who is the witch who goes missing in Book 4 from the Ministry?
Andrew: Not Bathilda.
Eric: Jorkins. Jorkins.
Andrew: Yes, Bertha Jorkins.
Eric: Bertha Jorkins. [laughs] Baggins. Bertha Jorkins - Voldemort is the one who broke her Memory Charm - or was it Wormtail? And he did that through torture, the idea that you can Crucio somebody or cause somebody enough pain that they un-forget what they have forgotten is horrifying, but I think that's what that kind of thing takes in order to un-Obliviate somebody, you need to cause that person pain, and again, stronger wizards alone can cause the most sort of pain that's going to be the most effective. So, I don't know, that's how I feel about that.
Andrew: All right. Well, I think John brings up some good points and so do you. That would be another one of those questions that needs to be asked to Jo to hear what she thinks.
Eric: But she won't be answering us as pen and paper are her priority at the moment.
Andrew: Maybe on an encyclopedia to explain such a thing.
Eric: Oh, look at that! Maybe.
Andrew: Well, before we say goodbye to everybody, don't forget about our website MuggleCast.com, it has all the information you need about each and every episode that we do here for you. And there on the site, you'll find several important links. There's a "Twitter" button so you can follow us, Twitter.com/MuggleCast. There's a "Like Us on Facebook" button, Facebook.com/MuggleCast. And we recently added to our site - it's actually been around for a good amount of time - a fan Tumblr, MuggleCast.Tumblr.com. If you use Tumblr, you can follow this fan Tumblr and - I say fan Tumblr because it's run by two great fans, Allie and Angel. And get some fun MuggleCast updates that way as well.
Andrew: They put quotes, pictures...
Eric: Quotes, latest episodes, pictures of us, retro pictures of us that are pretty cool. It's kind of a good - it's always like a flashback and a flash-current, so it's kind of cool.
Andrew: [laughs] Flashback, flash-current.
Eric: Flash-current, flash-sideways, what are you going to say? I don't know what the right...
Andrew: All right. Well...
Andrew: Good enough. And also on MuggleCast.com, click on "Contact" at the top, you can e-mail us and maybe your e-mail will be read on the show. If it's not read on the show, it will definitely be read by one of us as we sort through the mailbag...
[Show music begins]
Andrew: ...as we pick out e-mails to read on the air. So...
Eric: Micah will be back with us on the next MuggleCast.
Andrew: Yes, which will be sooner than your normally-scheduled MuggleCast because we have lots still more to talk about.
Eric: News, news, news.
Andrew: Yeah. Thanks everyone for listening! I'm Andrew Sims.
Eric: And I'm Eric Scull.
Andrew: And we'll see you next time for Episode two-two-fi-fi-fi-fi-five!
Eric: Beep, beep.
[Show music continues]
Written by: The Transcribers