According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a quibble is an “objection to a point of detail, a minor complaint or criticism,” but criticism is only a small part of the analysis we have here. Welcome to the office of The Quibbler. We are the Alternative Voice of the Wizarding World. Have you read our magazine before? If not, take some time to browse and comment on the essays we’ve published.
We should also tell you that our magazine does not rely on our writers alone. We love submissions from individuals who are passionate about their work. If you would like to send us a quibble of your own, we ask two things of you. First, follow our Guidelines for Submissions (they are easy, we assure you). Second, check out our Writing Tips and FAQs and so you can make your editorial as strong as possible. Happy writing!
To submit your quibble, send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please be sure your essay poses and answers a question. Additionally, keep your text between 500–2,000 words, use appropriate, accessible language, and organize your thoughts in a clear format to present your ideas. Don't forget to proofread.
Please be sure that all submissions include the following:
- A title
- Author's name (your name or a pen name)
- Text of your essay in the body of the message
- A short summary of your essay in the body of the email
- Any specific formatting directions
Note: MuggleNet does not claim ownership of your essay, nor will we re-create it on any other parts of the site. However, we might just make some spelling and/or grammar corrections.
Thank you for sharing with us!
So you want to write for MuggleNet?
Because we receive editorials daily, many of which address two or three main topics, we thought sharing a few tips from the editors' side of the process might help the editorial writer who wants their submission to stand out from the rest. So feel free to treat the following ideas as a checklist of sorts - we guarantee you'll raise your odds of being posted. And don't forget to have fun!
- Grammar is extremely important. If we can't read it easily, we're apt to delete it. If you grossly misspell the names of important characters, spells, or places, we feel you don't really care. Punctuation styles may vary, as different countries use different styles, so just be sure to use one style and stick to it.
- Beware the overanalyzed topic. At the present time, these include "Is Snape good or bad?" and "Does Ron really belong in Gryffindor?" It's not that we won't accept editorials on these topics; we just hope you've read what's already been posted and find an original and interesting angle by which to approach the question.
- Don't rush. We don't always post long and heavily researched editorials (although some of us prefer them). Often, a reader is unexpectedly blessed with an original idea, quickly types an editorial, and sends it to us. Those with a natural gift for good grammar and creative writing are lucky; most others should relax and know we're always here, and the odds that someone else has seized upon your original idea are very low in most cases. Take your time. Jot your original idea down, brainstorm, look for supporting (and unsupporting!) evidence in the books, and address them in the editorial.
- Cite all quotes! Double-check you've copied the quote word for word, and include the page number(s), chapter name, and edition (e.g., US hardback). If you use the same edition throughout, you only have to say so in the first citation.
- Be sure your editorial is ready for publication. It's very confusing for us to get one, two, and sometimes three revisions. We have to go back and delete the old ones, and at times that can be a harrowing experience as we have to traverse the trenches of queued editorials. However, if new information comes to light after you've submitted your editorial and before it's been posted, feel free to send us an updated (and complete) version with a short explanation of the changes made.
- Clearly state the purpose of your email. If you are leaving feedback for a particular author or columnist, state it so we know where to forward the email. If you are sending us an editorial for a specific section other than the main page, tell us so. Also, please include your name as we would like to publish it with the editorial.
- Familiarize yourself with the section before contacting us with questions. Oftentimes, the answer to your question will appear before your eyes that way (see our Editorial FAQs below). For instance, if you would like to send feedback to a particular columnist and want to bypass the standard editorial email address, you'll likely find the writer's personal email address at the end of his or her column's main page.
- It's not required, but it would be helpful if a very brief description of the main point of your editorial is included in the email (especially if you're sending an attachment). If you're writing about an already overanalyzed topic, be sure to include how you look at it in an original way or include your fascinating conclusion - whatever you think will grab our attention.
- Send one editorial per email. It helps us keep up with submissions, and at times it will prevent a two-for-one deletion.
- Sometimes bravado works, sometimes it doesn't. Be sure you know how to use it before trying it on us.
- ALL CAPS is the very rude equivalent of yelling. Please don't do it.
- Get to know us! We promise we're nice people. Read through our editorials! Want more dirt on us? Check out the "Meet the Team" page.
We hope those helped a little. Don't let them intimidate or deter you... we just want you to know some of the standard things we look for in a process that often requires a first-glance pass-through. We'll add more tips as we think of them.
Have more questions? Read our Editorial FAQs below.
How do I submit an editorial?
Send your editorial directly through email, or as an attachment (preferably Microsoft Word documents), to email@example.com with "Editorial" as the subject.
Can I be a columnist?
We usually choose columnists from reliable authors who have consistently shown us they can write thought-provoking editorials. In other words, if you're interested in writing a regular column for us, don't ask us - show us. If you have ideas you'd like to share, write them up and send us editorials to post. Whether or not you're tapped to be a columnist, you're getting your ideas out there.
How long will it take for my editorial to be posted?
There is no set time limit. We've posted editorials the same day, the next day, and even four months later. It depends on so many factors, including the number of editorials we receive daily.
Will you let me know that you've received my editorial?
Sorry! We receive too many editorials to be able to do this for everyone. Unless you receive an error message, be assured that we've received your email.
Will you tell me why you decided not to post my editorial?
Again, sorry! Too many editorials to be able to do this for everyone, and frankly, we don't want to hurt anyone's feelings. If it's constructive criticism you're after, contact one of the editors individually and we'll help you as best as we can. If you feel that your editorial is worthy to be posted on MuggleNet and it still hasn't been posted six months later, feel free to submit it again - funny things can happen.
English isn't my primary language. Can I still submit an editorial?
Please only submit works if you are highly proficient in written English.
Can my editorial be linked to a thread in the CoS forums?
We actually don't have a strong connection to the CoS forums anymore. Instead, readers can leave comments on any of the editorials, which authors can feel free to respond to.
If you have any questions about writing for MuggleNet that are not addressed here, email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Minerva McGonagall: The Most Underrated Character in the Series – Part 2 (April 15, 2021) - Professor McGonagall may seem like just a teacher, but she's a warrior when she needs to be.
- Minerva McGonagall: The Most Underrated Character in the Series – Part 1 (April 14, 2021) - Both strict and compassionate, fierce and kind, Professor McGonagall is more than we ever give her credit for.
- Debunking Common False Myths You’ve Assumed About Hogwarts (August 25, 2020) - From movie mistakes to logical leaps, many fans end up with false beliefs about Hogwarts. Set your mistakes right here.
- Slytherins Are Just Hierarchical Believers (June 24, 2020) - The dominant trait of Slytherins is their awareness of their position in any and all hierarchical structures.
- When You Love the Character but Not Their Movie Version (April 9, 2020) - What happens when you love a book character and spend hours building them up in your head only to have their movie version be disappointingly unrecognizable from the image you had of them?
- It’s Time to Move Past the Hate: Let’s Heal the Fandom (February 9, 2020) - For this author, the "Harry Potter" fandom was once a strong, caring community. Recently, though, they have been disillusioned by the divisiveness and toxicity that they've experienced within the fandom.
- Magic and Elves – Part 3: Magic and Omission (December 3, 2019) - Is agency denied to house-elves or declined by them? There are several moments throughout the "Harry Potter" books that contradict the idea that house-elves are magically bound to obey their masters.
- Magic and Elves – Part 2: The Hidden Potential (December 2, 2019) - Voldemort underestimated the power of house-elves to his own detriment. This is the second article in a three-part series exploring social dynamics in the wizarding world and examines how house-elves are more intelligent and powerful than wizards perceive them to be.
- Magic and Elves – Part 1: Establishing the Hierarchy (December 1, 2019) - Discrimination within the wizarding world is prevalent. This is the first article in a three-part series exploring social dynamics in the wizarding world and forms a framework for understanding the social hierarchy between wizards and all magical creatures.
- What I Hope to See in “Fantastic Beasts 3” (November 8, 2019) - How can the third "Fantastic Beasts" film improve on what we've seen in the first two films in the series?