Pottermore CEO Susan Jurevics Explains Site Redesign and Hints at Future Changes
On December 4, MuggleNet went to the FutureBook 2015 conference in London, which promised to “bring together leading thinkers in publishing, retail, editorial, writing, marketing and tech, along with speakers from other industries.” The conference opened with a keynote speech by Susan Jurevics, Pottermore CEO since 2013, who talked about the Pottermore redesign and future plans for the company.
She began her speech by talking about the goals of Pottermore:
All of us at Pottermore are dedicated to unlocking the power of imagination. Our mission is to engage and delight the wizarding world community and celebrate the magic of storytelling. Pottermore has an entrepreneurial DNA, and we’re constantly placing bets on a variety of digital technologies, business models, and user experiences. [W]e aim to succeed, but we accept missteps as long as we learn from our experience and quickly move on.
It’s heartening to hear that Pottermore is receptive to feedback because many fans have expressed their disappointment at the site’s redesign. Jurevics went on to explain how the decision to develop Pottermore was driven by a change in consumer technology.
Let’s take a look at the world as it existed in 1997, the first year that Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was published in the UK. Back then, 1% of the world’s population used the internet. 1%! Mobile phone usage was just starting to take off, but very slowly.
So let’s look at our world today in 2015 […] Two significant developments this year signalled a major expansion in J.K. Rowling’s wizard[ing] world and resulted in exciting editorial changes for Pottermore.com. In August, principal photography began on the new Warner Brothers film, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. […] And in September, it was announced that the stage play Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is coming to London’s West End next summer. [In 2015,] mobile usage soared, with over 2.6 billion smartphone subscriptions globally. And that’s expected to nearly triple in the next 5 years, when nearly 70% of the world’s population will be using smartphones. It is one of the reasons we are betting that this is a critical platform to engage our audience.
While J.K. Rowling’s writing is still the most critical and differentiating component [of Pottermore], it’s really clear that we cannot rely on her for every single piece of content on the site, especially if we want to generate an almost daily flow of new information. Over the past several months, we’ve hired a team of writers to create exclusive reports and essays. We call them the Pottermore Correspondents. We have not revealed their identities, but they’re professional journalists and copywriters who have worked for major magazines and media outlets. [W]e use the correspondents to spotlight the products of our partner companies and fellow publishers.
The identity of the illusive Pottermore Correspondent has long been a mystery for Pottermore fans, and this is the first confirmation we’ve had that the Pottermore Correspondent is, in fact, a team of writers!
The decision to redesign Pottermore was also driven by a shift in its core user.
Another major change we saw this past year was in our audience composition. Our research indicates that our core user is a young, adult woman who had grown up with the books as a child and a teenager. This user is not just looking for more writing from J.K. Rowling; she’s also seeking news and information about the wizarding world. Our user feedback, and our desire to build lifetime customer value among a wider audience, led us to eliminate the gamified content and user roleplaying. Instead, we’re concentrating on other areas more appropriate to the young female demographic. The most significant way we addressed this challenge was to redesign our site in September. […] Our data is proving that our new site is appealing and useful to a wider and young-adult audience who are not role-playing super-fans.
Interesting to see that the elimination of the Pottermore moments was driven by a desire to attract the young female demographic. Although the Pottermore Correspondent promised that the Patronus and wand tests were in the works, this suggests that it may be a while until they are released. Maybe we’ll see them return as part of the promotion for Cursed Child or Fantastic Beasts?
The enhanced e-books went on sale in October and immediately made their way onto the iBook’s top 10 list paid books charts, in both the UK and the US. […] This is a prime example of us using digital technology to help develop a stronger relationship with the consumer. […] Pottermore is now, for the first time, working with other retailers to be more open and offer greater consumer access to Harry Potter e-books and audiobooks. Just two weeks ago, the Harry Potter digital audiobooks were made available globally for download on Audible. We re-jacketed the product for a digital-first reading experience. We developed jacket designs that work equally well in colour and monochrome, serve as strong thumbnails, and pop on the digital shelf, juxtaposed with other book titles. We’re so proud that 5 of our 7 books made it to Audible’s top 10 list the day of their launch.
Their new relationship with Apple, together with the realization that mobile is a critical platform, strongly hints that a Pottermore app may be in the works. Pottermore.com is already optimized for smartphones and tablets, but an app offers additional features such as push notifications, personalization, and greater interactivity.
The success of the enhanced e-books suggests that we’ll see an enhanced e-book version of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them released closer to the release of the movie. Imagine how the creatures from the book could come alive; dragons could breath fire, spiders could crawl through the text, and grindylows could swim through the pages. Maybe Eddie Redmayne will make an appearance in the “About the Author” section in his beautiful coat?
Our strategy in 2015 is to increase the opportunity for convenience and easy access to Harry Potter e-books and audiobooks to anyone, anywhere, at any time. But we’re not yet done. We’re working to secure more retail partnerships in the near future that will grow our digital footprint and give consumers more choice in where, and how, they purchase and consume our content. So we know we can’t stand still […] the world is just going too fast.
We’re in the imagination business. And as I often remind our team, we’re just trying to make a little magic, delight our audience, and sell some books.
What do you think about the redesigned Pottermore? Have you bought the audiobooks or enhanced e-books? Let us know in the comments!
You took down the original Pottermore site, without giving proper notice. Money, is your god, and the faithful readers came in last. They have every right to be upset. Rowling promised that site as a gift to her readers. She failed. Pottermore is another failure, but keep asking readers for their money, right? Enough said. -Never fooled by Rowling.
Still gonna say… Site’s rubbish. The site’s been mishandled badly, and out of curiosity, checking the glassdoor reviews… its’ not pleasant.
Pottermore has never actually asked us what we want from the site, so im wondering how they got all this “consumer information.”
If they would only ask us what we would like from the site, i feel they would get true and honest answers, but it doesnt match with what they want, so they wont do it.
To be fair… they did surveys a few times. I did one of them myself. And in a warped way, they “solved” issues people complained about. Like the role-play that got a bit smutty, they solved that by… axing off all of commenting. Then they fix cheating by…. removing all competitive features.
Giving them the best thoughts, they’re like Dobby in Chamber of Secrets. They SO want to help and be liked and do what they think is right. But they’re thick and they end up “helping” by making life more difficult and inflicting pain. With bludgers.
Making it worse is, like Dobby, they don’t really tell us why or what’s going on.
The old Pottermore needed improving, but this wasn’t it ….
As a young adult female who grew up with the books, I can safely say that the new Pottermore is NOT what I wanted. The ideas Jurevics describe are not about imagination. They are about profit. This is a consumerist exploitation of the deep love for Harry Potter that so many of us hold in our hearts.
“We use the correspondents to spotlight the products of our partner companies and fellow publishers.” “This is a prime example of us using digital technology to help develop a stronger relationship with the consumer.” “Pottermore is now, for the first time, working with other retailers to be more open and offer greater consumer access to Harry Potter e-books and audiobooks.” “We’re working to secure more retail partnerships.”
Other than the blatantly consumerist attitude that is in direct contrast to Pottermore’s original mission to bring free content to all who love Harry Potter, Jurevics’s statements also perpetuate a painful bias that “young, adult female” audiences are not interested in the “gameified” roleplay aspects. Yet I know far more female users of Pottermore than male, and far more female gamers than male. It is very sad that Pottermore, which did not used to care how old you were or what your gender was, but only how brave, intelligent, hard-working or ambitious you were, has jumped on this stereotyping bandwagon.
I think it’s a stupid idea!
For a start, the exploring and roleplaying elements were the big attractors to the site. There was a thriving roleplay community there. What a stupid mistake. I’m frankly annoyed that my account (collectables, wand, potions ingredients, badges, everything I earned on there) is now gone and the website now just looks like some boring corporate blog.
sorry Susan but you haven’t the slightest idea about what you are doing or even about what people want from pottermore.
I am a young adult female who grew up with the Harry Potter books, and I agree with the other comments here. The roleplaying game aspect of Pottermore was exactly what I wanted to see expanded, not thrown out. I was extremely frustrated when I lost everything attached to my account and found a big boring blog instead. I haven’t been on Pottermore in months because there’s nothing interesting to me there anymore. I agree especially with Helen: maybe you should actually ASK us consumers what it is we want from Pottermore, rather than doing a huge (ugly!) overhaul based on what you perceive to be the greatest potential profit.
I’m older and my daughters are slightly younger than the demographic they mention. All 3 of us would at least like to have the story read through/interaction back, even if we didn’t do potions and duels. My 19 and 17 year olds got back on to find out their patronas and were disappointed that the story was gone. I don’t see why they can’t coexist.